That’s it! I found it to be very interesting and informative on top of being well made. I highly recommend!

Angela Merkel is my spirit animal.

Flip it around and see how it looks from another angle: would the medical community have the right to step in and treat the child if the parents were not allowing treatment due to religious beliefs? Of course, because while the parents are 100% free to choose not to get medical attention for themselves, parents are…

True. But it kind of feels like cross marketing to some extent, because it’s so on the nose.

That’s totally true...everyone does it. Maybe it’s that his lyrics are SO on the nose in a way that leaves no doubt. Him name checking Becky and the elevator incident seems a bit too on the nose, particularly if you consider how this album is being released. It seems a little bit less like an artists response to…

Kind of on topic: what do you guys think about the fact that Jay is addressing the Becky problem on the album. Part of me likes the honesty (of the idea at least because I am not a Tidal subscriber) but another part of me is a little skeptical about the two of them monetizing their marital issues.

Really? That’s so shady!

And that is exactly what Courtney Stodden claims...that she is dressing like that because she is a feminist and it empowers her somehow. Celebrating your femininity and your sexuality is wonderful and I hate to judge another woman for doing so but constantly leading with sex and with your body isn’t really achieving…

Those are much better examples!

I’ve heard the name but can’t think of where. It’s very pretty.

It’s a joke. And a little bit of thinking the idea of government banning a name is bad in the abstract but then being reminded by such a ridiculous name as Sir. I’m sure Sir Sir Carter will wipe his tears with hundred dollar bills.

Exactly. This is done every fucking day with famous people both living and dead. I’m hate watching Salem right now and if this suit goes forward and she wins, the descendants of Cotton Mather might have a thing or two to say! Seriously...in the show he’s a drunken whore monger who is barely even Christian.

Federal sentences are intentionally scary. They don’t want to try people...they want to force them to take a deal so they wave around all sorts of trumped (can we get a different term for this now...I get sick just tying the word) up charges with insane sentences so that you will think they are giving you a good deal…

I absolutely love Marie Antoinette, she really could push herself. As everyone is pointing out, she seems to only make movies about sad, rich, white women. I guess if that’s all she is interested in, fine...but don’t try to justify it with some bullshit bullshit.

Yes! Send him on a tour to make sure all Aussies know that he doesn’t represent all of us!!!

I disagree. That is part of the country but it does not represent me or my friends. I wouldn’t even say that most Americans are that way. I am not advocating just sitting around tweeting hashtag phrases but rather to demonstrate that he doesn’t represent America.

Exactly.

Interesting! Thanks for the additional info. The more crazy names get the more I support some sort of rules. But some rules are ridiculous. Mercedes is an example of how common sense rules can get out of control.

I just recently learned that Germany has some pretty strict naming laws. For example, you must be able to tell the gender of the child by their first name. They also outlaw brands and last names as first names. Three days ago I thought the idea was absurd but now I’m not so sure. Rumi is cute but Sir??? What happens…

Here’s the thing that we somehow need to make people understand: the government doesn’t “fund” PP the way it funds the CDC. When you hear Republicans talking about defunding PP, they are really talking about not allowing you to choose a PP clinic to get your PAP and have Medicaid cover it. It’s really fucking…