In addition to Grand Jury definition errors, Standard of Proof is not relevant to bringing charges against a defendant. It is relevant to proving a case. In other words, it is not relevant to starting an action, it is relevant to ending an action.

“...and then determine if someone on trial is guilty or innocent of the crimes they’re charged with.”

Sorry Lindsey, but your definition for Grand Jury is incorrect.  A grand jury does not determine guilt or innocence, but rather if there is probable cause.  What you have described is a Trial or Petit Jury.  This link gives a nice overview of the differences:  https://www.banksjones.com/2020/08/26/whats-the-difference-…

Dude, I’m GenX and you sound like my grandfather, had my grandfather been a reactionary moron. The people with the least power and influence on the system are not the ones responsible for these issues. What do you think the average age of a Trump voter is? The average age of the Supreme Court Justices, or any of the…

Gen Z CAN’T fix anything, the Silent Generation and Boomers are still clinging to power. Gen Z has done more to solve for gun violence than previous generations - the gun control laws that passed a few weeks ago are a direct result of the constant protesting and advocacy by the Parkland kids and others who’ve grown up…

Agreed. Was a bit surprised here. A grand jury determines if there is sufficient evidence to go forward with a trial. What the author describes is a normal jury.

That’s not what a grand jury is......

Might take another quick peek at Grand Jury . . .

I looked it up the ‘13 optima hybrid has a range of 619 miles.  Already a better deal.

The grand jury description is incorrect. A grand jury does not hear from the defense nor does it determine guilt or innocence. It is intended only to determine if it is more likely than not that a crime was committed and more likely than not that the accused committed that crime. It is typically required to charge a…

No, hangovers are due to the byproduct alcohol dehydrogenase. It essentially poisons you.

I’m not going to defend the US and it’s policies to much but there still is a difference between the US policy of being the worlds police force and anti-terrorism war machine and Russia straight up just saying “we want this land now and are taking it”

Yes, good. Let the leftist self-cannibalizing and purity tests begin! 

Russia will do what it always does with computer technology:  steal something, rebrand it, and call it Russian Technical Might.

I imagine that it would the software equivalent of the Russian military, spending so much money on flashy high-tech weapons that they can't afford forklifts to load their supply trucks

Another major issue not covered here is that even if the economic factors are completely ignored, Russia has been dealing with some significant brain drain as millions of educated citizens have been fleeing the country, particularly tech employees, meaning that most of the people who could do this work aren’t sticking…

I’m not saying YOU have to feel more comfortable with supporting Fetterman after Miyares wrote very plainly that he forgives him, believes that “it is inhumane to believe one mistake should define a man’s life,” and explicitly endorses him. But that makes me feel more comfortable voting for Fetterman.

The guy he chased in that incident both forgave him and endorsed him. But hey, nurse your grudge. 

I think you meant Oz.

Explain.