When asked what he’s going to do now that he’s got a 100 million dollar contract, Antetokounpo said he’d carry on the fine Greek tradition of spending all 300 million of it.
When asked what he’s going to do now that he’s got a 100 million dollar contract, Antetokounpo said he’d carry on the fine Greek tradition of spending all 300 million of it.
Well, at least someone in the Mariners organization knows the meaning of “Proactiv.”
“Don’t worry Steve, I’ve still got your back”
The only possible conspiracy that concerns me right now is the whereabouts of Rom Romberts.
That’s a lot of cocaine suppositories!
Yes, that would be shady but seeing how it’s Drew, you could give him all the data in the world and he’d still lose.
That there’s a noun.
BRB
“Fuck these plants”
-Kid Rock, after leaning botany had nothing to do with butts
Snowboarding seems right in Hinkie’s wheelhouse - who else has demonstrated his level of achievement when it comes to careening downhill?
It’s the entire assumption here, it doesn’t need to be spelled out. Hamilton likes to play pretend economist/financial guru sometimes but anyone who knows anything can see right through him. Pay no mind.
This is not advanced financial jargon, you just know nothing about finance.
I agree. The refs may have gotten the call wrong per the rule book but I think the call should be made the way they called it. You shouldn’t be allowed to intetionally ground it to end the game.
I understand the rule as written, but it seems like there should be a clause to account for changes in possession due to a loss of down penalty as time expires. In theory, I’m okay with the Chippewas getting the ball back for one final shot, the rule book just needs to be modified to allow it.
They certainly called it wrong. That said - why aren’t more people talking about how they called it the way that makes sense? A loss of down penalty at the end of regulation by the offense should result in a turnover and un-timed play for the same reason that the game can’t end on an defensive penalty.
Well, how about providing us with that exemption from the rulebook?
Bananas for Simian? How original!
I think it’s a case of mistaken identity. Suspicion should be falling on Zach Mettenberger.