So I am going to say this, as the owner of four (4!) homepods that I bought at various large discounts.

Um, no. I was genuinely curious to begin with- that’s why I asked.

“ First off, the case is relevant because it did not allow others to publish games without going through a gatekeeper and another company circumvented that and got sued for copyright due to methods they used.”

Interesting. So you are citing Sega v. Accolade- which is a case that has nothing to do with antitrust law, but is only about fair use in the context of copyright ... that means ... what, exactly? Genuinely curious?

I was looking for someone to say this!

Hey Curves- I was away for a while, and ... oh. It’s all gone.

Hey.

I am mad, and will continue to be mad, and may always be mad, about the loss of the stick shift in ‘Murika.

I have been to Disney World twice since they re-opened, for extended stays.

Normally, I hate all the selections by everyone. But .... Allison is the clear winner.

Well, yes. It is ... complicated. Theoretically, truly frivolous lawsuits can be sanctioned, but that almost never happens.

So here’s the rub. It’s not quite that simple, unfortunately.

“I think more actions like this will be occurring as some of these ADA suits are definitely just for money and abusing the court system.”

That was me. I posted the link.

Now you’re changing things- and you probably wouldn’t know why the Unruh claim was pled if it bit you on the posterior.

“I generally favor accessibility; but I agree that these suits are about lining pockets. Nobody wants Taco Bell or Wendy’s that badly.”

And this was a drive-thru. Literally the salient distinction that you are missing.

I occasionally have to advise people (and businesses) on the ADA.

“As a paraplegic, I get a bit disgusted when the ADA is used to promote entitlement like this”

“I think it’s less about “using the drive through” and more about restaurants having two different sets of hours based on one’s ability to operate a car, thus relegating an entire group ineligible to be accommodated during those hours even though they’re part of a protected class. Dick.”