logophobe
logophobe, desperate dad
logophobe

Credit to Crawford, for sure, but the rest of Chicago’s defense was also nigh-impenetrable. As a Wild fan it was pretty sucky to watch, but I have to admit being impressed here in the cold light of day.

I’m incapable of directly wishing harm on anyone...

...and I just go to town on that fucker. Am I the only one who does this?

Fun fact! “Jowly Cornpone” is actually Huckabee’s given name.

Wow, I didn’t know I could eyeroll hard enough to hurt myself! I would sympathize with your point if the joke was about diabetes, and not mocking a shitty, awful chain restaurant. Just mentally replace “diabetes” with “quadruple bypass” if you prefer - which is no less medically inaccurate, and no less serious a

Maybe the should start by making... food. Buns that aren’t made of styrofoam, burgers that are more than 15% actual meat, that kinda thing.

“Also, please take this complementary diabetes as a souvenir of your tour!”

The same could be said of every run up to the GOP primary for the last decade. And I love laughing at the clown show every time.

I must get really lucky. Whenever I get quizzed about not liking raw tomatoes, I just tell people “It’s a texture thing” and they generally look at me as if I just dropped some Serious Knowledge.

I know, right? Elected assholes like this are a solid argument against democracy.

Probably they do not have these things, but that’s not the point. Being able to make a single great drink with an unfamiliar ingredient is the way in. After that this “internet” thing will show you hundreds of other drinks to make with that esoteric ingredient.

Somewhat puzzled why you didn’t list cutting your own parts from a whole bird as a way to acquire carcasses. I mean, it’s gross and requires some knife skill, but not so much really. Turning a whole bird into a bunch of bird parts will make you step back and go dang, maybe I actually have some idea what I’m doing here.

Right, because god forbid they answer to the public for killing a man in their custody, right? This is all of the kinds of horseshit.

If you’re just realizing that now, then so are you!

It’s a complete rabbit hole. Even science is clueless. Adam Rogers’ Proof: The Science of Booze is a great read on the topic but not especially enlightening on this nuance.

“My feeling has always been... is that I believe that you helped the administration take us to the most devastating mistake in foreign policy that we’ve made in 100 years,” he said. “But you seem lovely!”

Uh - that appears to be a takedown of the idea that you can’t get drunk on 3.2 beer, which is obviously untrue. But the stuff definitely exists, even though it’s a waste of space.

I’m not sure that’s actually true - other states like MN also have similar restrictions. Supermarkets here can only sell 3.2 beer, usually versions of big-name brews. Except on Sunday, when alcohol sales are banned for absolutely no good reason (and yet we can’t seem to pass any reform bills).

Haha “hot water”

That only implies lack of experience, not lack of potential!