His post was pretty clear in that it explicitly referenced the fact that everyone is dying.

It was also a straw that broke the camel’s back situation.

Agreed - I can also see Hereditary. It has some visuals and moments where an immersive experience makes sense. Uncut Gems just seems like a cash grab to get the higher ticket.

I watched this specifically for Aisling Bea, tbh.

Moon Knight had pretty high viewership according to places that monitor that and is getting a steelbox release next month that implies they are planning a second season.

Guy who was fired from The Witcher for being abusive was abruptly fired from a new show one week before it comes out when he was previously actively promoting the show and then also deleted his own social media accounts with no one offering even a pat industry response of creative differences does indeed make it a…

Uncut Gems doesn’t seem like it really needs the full IMAX experience.

I believe there is also a fairly wide-range of MS types and severities.

Arguably, they could also be talking about the post-war treatment of Oppenheimer and the whole of fascism and WW2 in general. 

I suspect you might have stumbled onto a theme.

I’m hoping The Last of Us sticks to 3 - 4 seasons max (with the assumption that the plot of the second game will go across 2 seasons). I don’t know that zombie shows work well as super extended storytelling. There’s only so much you can do (and Walking Dead did a lot of it).

I don’t think it helps keeping the franchise going that there is now a buzzier, award attention getting zombie show airing on HBO that has a higher budget and talent in front of and behind the camera that’s not burned out on playing the same characters over and over again.

The source of the live round does matter and the chain of who handled the gun also matters. She can absolutely make the case that someone else mishandled the gun who wasn’t meant to be handling it and that the supplier mismarked live rounds as dummy rounds (part of her defense team’s assertions) and from a legal…

All of which is circumstantial without proof she was the source of the live round.

I loved the first season of Serial.

There is a fair amount of legal precedent for people in these situations being found innocent. Most set shootings don’t end up with charges. Most set deaths have seen those involved walk away without criminal charges.

I think the key piece here is the idea that it could be “regret.” It could be “I regret that I trusted Seth Kenney who supplied the bullets” or “I regret that I did everything right and that wasn’t enough.” A sense of moral responsibility vs legal responsibility isn’t the same. This seems like weak proof.

It’s often a human impulse to say “I’m sorry.” People apologize all the time for things they don’t have to say sorry for. 

I don’t think saying “I’m sorry” proves you were guilty of a crime. To be clear, I think Gutierrez-Reed is culpable based on the evidence that we have. I just don’t think saying “I’m sorry” means anything as proof.

The moments when Baldwin acted unsafely also aren’t directly related to the incident. Unless they can prove in that moment he wasn’t doing what he was supposed to, the fact that he was generally a dick about it will likely mean nothing.