Fingerprinting criminals was standard by the beginning of the 20th century, and they’d been used on contracts since the mid-19th century, so I do think it it was common knowledge by 1957. I’d certainly hope the police thought of it, though.
Fingerprinting criminals was standard by the beginning of the 20th century, and they’d been used on contracts since the mid-19th century, so I do think it it was common knowledge by 1957. I’d certainly hope the police thought of it, though.
Nah, some people are just assholes.
Clearly, you are not aware of the cultural implications of yachts, sweater sets, and having enough money to feel like it excuses your behavior.
It’s not about them having money. Its about the fact that they, extremely privileged people who have been blessed beyond most, felt the need to berate a minimum-wage restaurant worker because they couldn’t have what they wanted immediately. It just shows a sort of general entitlement and ingratitude.
Most normal people realize that technology isn’t magical or perfect, and understand when a human tells you the restaurant is full, the restaurant is full.
We don’t know if they did or not. You’ve got to be a pretty dumb murderer not to wear gloves or wipe things down. And even today with our databases and computerized identification, fingerprints can be kinda useless if you don’t already have an idea of who your persons of interest are.
Or the killer could have readjusted the glasses later. Or could have meant to keep them as a trophy and then got scared.
It could have been a horizontal model. Those used to be a lot more popular too. I just think its bizarre that somebody went to the trouble to freeze her instead of just dumping her in a lake or something. Makes you wonder why they held onto the body for so long.
The shorter one’s a dude? Really?
Who are the people in the second picture?
A meat freezer?
They should be, in that case. The issue here is that the contract did not specify a time frame.
Well, there’s a difference between saying, “Can I have the rice instead of the potatoes” or “I have X allergy, can you accomodate that?” and asking a restaurant to invent new items for you.
Ugh, I agree. The number of people who defend these nutcases with “But it’s just one request!” or “If the restaurant CAN make it, they SHOULD!” is ridiculous. If you are incapable of ordering off the menu and being satisfied, maybe it isn’t the restaurant for you.
When I was 15 and working in a public library, I regularly had people who came up to me and went, “I read this book and it was really popular in 1979. You must remember it! Tell me what it was!”
I was about to say. Riding a bike with *no* hands isn’t even that difficult.
IDK. The white gay dude represented LGBT folks in the media for pretty much all of the nineties and early 00’s. I’m okay with the white lesbians getting a shot, although it’d be nice to see some other varieties of queer folks too.
Its funny how these sorts of comments never show up on ads about straight people.
They might not have let him know. He might have been specifically targeting one woman at time, or heard through other workers at the mall that the complaint had been filed, or the victim might’ve told him herself in an attempt to get him to go away
Surely you understand how smaller forces in society can create disproportionate responses in some individuals? Of course MRAs don’t advocate murdering women. But their ideas—that women should always respond positively to men’s advances, that comments on women’s appearances are always welcome, that women are to blame…