I understand like...one of those problems.

MOTHER OF GOD....::whoops there goes my pants::: (also +1 for wearing a denim coat)

Mehhhh, most of these were just early ‘00 trends. Unless someone dresses exclusively in classic pieces (and what teen does), their look from 15 years ago is not going to past current-day muster. It’s NBD. It’s what makes fashion fun. As evidence, I submit Britney rocking the pink leather newsboy cap:

I know that Gilmore Girls had a race problem, and a food problem, and a monogamy problem

still hot af

also it seemed to me that there was a “wear whatever was on the clearance rack”aesthetic to it because lorelai and rory weren’t supposed to have that much money?

The wording used in the statement is “highly qualified.”

Yeh, the clothing style most DEFINITELY fit the era of clothing. the Early 2000s were a fucked up time for a lot of us.

I totally disagree. I think that the clothing suited their characters, and that the show did a good job with the time they were working with (early 2000s, not a great time for fashion, but definitely a time when those scarves were everywhere) and also growing with them - Rory’s wardrobe in particular. Rory, at the…

She WAS the editor of the Yale Daily News. She was dressing for the job she wanted? (Totally agree the outfits weren’t age appropriate, but I kinda loved all the tweediness.)

Rebellious Lane Kim is my style icon, forever and always.

Especially with purple hair (aka horrible HORRIBLE wig)

HOWEVER: Boy did they EVER get Jess right.

Keep in mind it was also the early 2000s-a very dark time for fashion trends.

So this article is a little confusing. After reading the AL.com report, it sounds like they weren’t saying she wasn’t “qualified,” just that she wasn’t “certified” to teach 5th Grade. In this case, that’s apparently true, since her certification covered her through 3rd Grade. If Federal requirements for funding are…

I would also like some discussion around this point. I think part of it because she lied about it previously? That she wasn’t up front with her historical position of privilege. But we don’t subject male to female trans to do this - do we? Can we please talk about this?

Yes, she made the following comments in her VF cover interview:

I’ll admit my ignorance on this matter and seek clarification. I understand that trans-activism is gaining steam and it’s important for people to feel accepted as they self-identify. Why is this different?

“She also revealed that she’s pregnant...but did not reveal the race of the father.”

She may have been born white, but in her heart she will always be Hawaiian Tropic #3a Medium/Dark.

It’s all for you, Obama!