Because no one is going to be harmed by this approach? This is the polar opposite of the “guys lurk in women’s clothes to touch girls” anti-neutral bathroom rant, but no one sees a risk of having easier access provided to boys at privileged boarding schools know to be hotbeds of sexual violence to victimize fellow…

When the more reputable of the two is known solely for being the naked chick behind the son of a famous person in a video produced to promote a copyright infringement, how could it not be fabulous if they said so?

Why shouldn’t they? They created the artistic work (the framing, capturing light, cropping, etc). If you want to stop copyright for photography then sure it’s all about the subject’s rights. The much more interesting question would be if there was a famous paparazzi shot of her and she had her assistant recreate it…

Seriously. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good 10 year old with a gun

Can we stop calling this an overbooked flight? The extra passengers were the airlines employees flying for free. Overbooking suggest that there were more customers than seats, not that the airline wanted to forcefully bump paying customers to avoid delays for their own staff

You know that is incorrect, right? A restaurant can’t make the server pay, or even reimburse if their till is short. They would violate the minimum wage law if they did so. They can only fire an employee or press charges if a crime occurred.

Oregon staple? You mean “pink badge of shame carried by tourists.” Oregonians might generally be slower than your average bear, but none of them (us) voluntarily eat this garbage or would waste our time waiting on line for it

Yes it was. Wash Correspondents Dinner

Most manbabies get off on having their testicles crushed. Just sayin

They don’t even start until 10 a.m. Thanks for more proof that NYC>Bos in every way possible. In NYC the parade starts then, so your been in a pub for an hour at least by 9:45

Except of course it is commercial in nature and risk substitution in the marketplace, and so nicks away at the 4th prong of the F.U. Test As one still fucking pissed at the travesty in Acuff Rose v Campbell, I have my problems with the prongs, but I think it still stands

Hi heeled sneakers have been a pop culture thing since the 60s.

If you took a sociology class and you don’t know whose fault it is, it probably means it’s your fault and you are too blinded by privilege to see it.

Except the research is how they get caught. Like when Casey Anthony googled about chloroforming a baby. Which lead to her conviction...oh wait you’re right. Research away. Jurors will ignore your search history evidently

Typical.

There is absolutely a direct link between the decision to disregard risk to civilian life (Trump’s policy) and Obama’s use of limited force that used best efforts to restrict those casualties. He has a stated goal of taking off the handcufffs and going full bore. From NC Public Radio:

Sounds about right from the scant facts, though can’t wait to read the theory. Feels much like the woman in a Carolina a few years back who sued her husband’s side-piece for alienation of affection and loss of consortium. Bill thought he owned her and so feels doubly burned that she dared to have any agency to get…

But if you come from Taiwan, Thai-two, or Canada, you are an African. -Peter Tosh

Could be simply because mandatory is a relatively new phenomenon and has only slowly spread from teachers and doctors to other professions. Child abuse wasn’t even illegal until the 1960s in any state. We forget how recent basic decency developed for children under the law. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/v…

Really? Where are you that it is hard to get weed? It’s legal all over and hardly hard to get.