Do you really think they’re hiring WOMEN to talk about GUNS? Why, that’s what the menfolk are there for! The women just need to look pretty, smile, and tell Bubba how sexy he is with that AR-15 slung across his chest in the ready position.

Nah, it’s okay if a woman can form complete sentences and be able to enunciate. Now, if she starts getting these crazy ideas in her head about having independence and being able to vote, then she’s gonna have to be straightened out.

Like I said in another thread: they think that by specifying that the woman must be able to “speak intelligently,” they’ve eliminated all other candidates by default.

Here’s the sad thing: by specifying that the applicant must “speak intelligently,” they think they’ve eliminated all other ethnicities, so there’s no need to specify “whites only.”

Well, damn, I half expected to see “and a signed note from a doctor stating that your hymen is intact” in the qualifications.

You know what’s spooky? I started playing Rise of the Tomb Raider and thought, “Daisy Ridley should be the next Lara Croft.” Then, I get done playing and check Facebook, and guess what’s one of the trending topics?

Your son makes us all smile. :-)

I shall remember this day, for when this young man runs for public office, I can proudly say that I remember his first act of positive social change.

Thanks. I hadn’t had a good hate read in about, oh, twenty-seven minutes.

Yeah, here’s the thing: Trump is only going to have a sensible opinion until there’s some blowback from it. He’s going to change his song and dance as soon as his advisor tells him it will cost him votes.

Ladies and gentlemen, the best song from the greatest soundtrack ever.

Was the fatherhood of the child required to be verified? Like, did candidates have to submit to a blood test and all that, and it was only once the identity of the father was confirmed and his consent given that the child could be put up for adoption?

I get that he’s trying to make a sports analogy and it came out horribly, terribly wrong. That doesn’t excuse him from recognizing that if he read it as written (because he was reading a speech somebody else had written off a teleprompter) it would come out horribly, terribly wrong.

I don’t know why I’m laughing at that terrifying image.

Start with the short story collections, published here in the US as The Witcher and The Sword of Destiny. Then, move on to the series of novels starting with Blood of Elves. If you just want to hit the high notes, then the stories “A Question of Price” and “The Last Wish” are the ones that most heavily influence the…

The main problem that people I know have read the books have with the show is characterization. For example, my wife stopped watching because she simply didn’t find any of the characters interesting anymore. She’s also read all the books; I don’t think this is a coincidence.

Yes, especially when it comes to the dynamic between her, Geralt, and Ciri.

Yes. They do refer to events and characters that happen in the books, however. For the most part, you wouldn’t get the references if you haven’t already read at least some of the books.

When you take out your loaded gun and wave it around in a roomful of children, then any shooting that results is intentional.

Not necessarily saying I get this vibe from your article, but the vibe I *do* generally get from book fans is anger at the show runners for outpacing the books.