Yes, as safeties... not shutdown corners with $17M salaries

“We need to be praying for Hillary Clinton. There’s special needs there, there’s mental impairment...”

Yes.

That last photo is incredible. It takes a second or two to put it all together, then you just kinda grin and shake your head in awe.

THEY ARE ERRYWHERE

From that Pew survey (which is here, for anyone interested):

And it needs to be spent, because there is a salary floor. As part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, teams must have payrolls that constitute 90 percent of the salary cap.

I just read her Wikipedia and found this:

Yes, but one has a legitimate shot to effect change and push the Democratic party to the left, the other is a misguided and ill-fated publicity stunt that engenders animosity and contempt.

This is tiresome. The lawsuit seems flimsy, at best, and the whole ordeal is a doomed distraction that just exacerbates liberal animosity. Isn’t DWS running against a legitimate opponent in the Democratic primary for the first time in forever? Maybe give some time/money/attention to her opponent and try to help vote…

Thank you. Using “rape” as a synonym for plunder/pillage is technically correct—hell, liberal economists, environmentalists, etc. use it all the time to describe capitalist exploitation.

The UN?!?! Nah, the key is to set up shop in Australia, establish a chokehold in SE Asia, and then turtle for half an hour while everyone else destroys one another before you make your move...

But that isn’t a real choice for Fiorina, whose feminism—if measured in the relationship between social equity and her policies of choice—is about as substantial as a cardboard cutout of a suffragette...

This is either a really good comment or a really bad one.

I’m agnostic on the draft itself, but if we are going to have it then all citizens who are fit to serve should be required to register.

Gawker took out a $22M loan from Cerberus Capital to help keep the doors open while they work through bankruptcy.

There’s a 99% chance this man refers to Republicans who disagree with him as “Cuckservatives”

In the Response to Dissents, the majority also provided a nice and succinct history lesson* on the subject: