Pretty sure you’re thinking of Darth Vader.

Ah, Jalopnik readers: The last bastion of the Humor Impaired.

No no no. This is the Priceline Negotiator.

“I’m sorry, but your Ferrari’s policy specifically excludes damage that happens on a track.”

This communicates the health of the intake manifold

I KNOW WHAT THIS IS!

Thats not how economics work. There has always been inflation. Remember there used to be so much value in our money that the US mint issued half cent coins. 

Actually, yeah, that is. A. Facelift.

did a sneaker write this

Ur right. Porsche loved it when I got a quarter-million people to look at this:

Your friend sounds like a boomer, too self-absorbed and stupid to plan properly for the future.

Got you covered - in HD!

1st Gear/Neutral:

It’s shitty and negligent, but there is no intention to deceive or defraud.

I do have a law degree, as do the judges who wrote this decision. I worked a law clerk for nearly 3 years.

Your focus is wrong. Your focus is on the term “unfair”, which is a subjective term.  The full term is “unfair practice”, which has a direct legal definition that isn’t matched by the actions taken by the mechanic in this case.

Yes, and he’s right. The statute is design to punish worse dealers who go “Oh, we changed your oil and replaced your fuel filter,” but didn’t DO that. It is not designed to punish ordinary negligence in “oh, we changed your oil, but did it poorly.” One represents a fraud on the customer, the other is just negligent.

And in this case the court was right. There was nothing unfair or deceptive about forgetting to tighten the lug nuts, what was just negligence. In this case the mechanic *did* actually rotate the tires, he just did a shitty job at it.