Look, it’s possible to rationalize anything bad that one happens to agree with.

You know what this country need more of? Moral scolds willing to judge people based on knowing nothing at all about what’s going on in their lives. Thanks for stepping up to the plate!

Some of this is in a reply I made to another commenter but:

It’s a legal argument and a fair one.

See, this is the problem.

Cheating is between the two people in a relationship. They have to work that shit out. I’m not a part of it, no matter what I think of it.

How.... is that not the entire basis of the Sanders campaign?

It’s not his fault; it’s somehow HRC’s fault that Sanders (who was in office at the time) voted for the bill and she (who wasn’t in office at the time and therefore had no ability to vote for or against the bill) didn’t.

In Bill’s defense, he didn’t particularly want to sign that version of the bill and had vetoed several previous versions of it. But all that played out in the lead-up to the ‘96 elections, and he was pretty sure that if he vetoed it again his opponents would be able to use the obstructionist card against him (remember…

Those are the same reasons why the Clintons supported it, as Bill said during the same exchange this article is about.

This is the third time Gawker Media has posted this exact same content today. Trying to manufacture outrage much?

Protests based on a misinterpretation of a speech from 21 years ago which she’s since repudiated, as opposed to protesting people who are the actual problem. OK then.

I guess I don’t understand what all this uproar is about.

An aside...I’ve observed that these sort of articles tend to get a huge influx of Sander’s supporters comments fairly quickly during the day/afternoon, but then the Clinton leaning supporters catch up replying later in the day/evening. This started out a little differently as it started on Jezebel/the slot and then…

That one got an aggressive eye-roll from me too. Besides the inherent idiocy of assuming people who are “old” (god seriously, 40 is old??) can’t use the internet, it has this terrible taste of diminishing older feminists into confused soccer moms who are bad at technology or something. Maybe there is a reason all…

Jim: You playing that game again?
Dwight: Second Life is not a game. It is a multi-user virtual environment. It doesn’t have points or scores, it doesn’t have winners or losers.
Jim: Oh it has losers.

And the fact that he so freely said that he just hasn’t thought about it- WTF?! It’s one thing to saw something like “I’ve thought a lot about this but it’s complicated and there is no easy fix” but to have NOT THOUGHT AT ALL about it when he’s been running for freakin president for months now (not to mention the fact…

I am from PA so I was able to switch both my mind and my vote but I feel you.

Elizabeth Warren isn’t the female Bernie Sanders. She’s polished and professional in a way that he has never had to be.

Agreed, she was also a Republican through the Reagan and Bush years! Clinton gets called a Goldwater Girl so I can only imagine....