Isn’t it typical of a billionaire to tout deregulation, just not in the backyard of his beloved ranch.
l......
l----
We are watching this kid peak. But it feels like the plateau and decline aren’t too far behind.
Known serial abuser of women continues to abuse more women unhindered, volume 9015671. Meanwhile some bleat about “cancel culture”. Because society would rather invent a phantom problem than have their playlists inconvenienced by violence against women.
Brad Pitt’s professor friend on her new union to the NYT
When garbage dumpster fire met gasoline.
Exactly. Some are just in the running to be MSNBC’s next pundit. Not sure why the crowded line is being trotted out with these announcements like it’s a handicap.
The Republican primary field of 2016 was a clown car of 17 candidates. Yet conservatives got their shit together in record time for the ticket bearer. Given their record, liberals will make this non-issue a problem for themselves.
Trump isn’t the type of crazy you move mad on. You never know which way the volatile motherfucker will swerve.
Deaconess aunties over there really ought to know better. We know they are hyper vigilant towards us. What’s new? Michelle Obama wrote about how she made sure all their personal expenses were properly accounted for in the White House because she knows they are always trying to catch us riding dirty. What Would…
It should be. Apart from its inspirational appeal, it is also damn good writing. Some of the passages are quite literary yet unfussy. She and her collaborators did an excellent job.
Everything we own is an indicator of personality. No reason why books should be different.
Perhaps. Given her cred it is a missed opportunity if no one could come up with an idea intellectually and financially worth her time.
Her sensuality is ineffable. So effortless. It is a crime that no beauty company or fashion house ever gave her enough million $$$$$$ reasons to do an ad campaign.
Technically nothing. Never wanted anything more in my life.
She seemed nervous. Which I guess I would be if I were announcing something so monumental.
Let me restate. Masculinity does not equal toxicity. “Toxic” masculinity is a certain rigid concept of manhood. “Toxic” is an adjective. That’s how qualifiers and subtypes work.
They won’t admit they are afraid of losing the status quo. So they couch it in whataboutism and faux concern.
What world do you live in where the issues you raised are not influenced by society’s expectation of femininity and beauty. There is nothing wrong with femininity or masculinity. We are inviting men to discuss how societal roles place undue pressures on them. But you will rather bury your heads in the sand.
The Gillette ad and the APA tried to put men’s wellbeing at the forefront of our national conversation. But a lot of men would rather keep their tendency to homicidality, suicidality, sexual abuse than lose any of their power.
The patriarchy elevates women who will uphold its structure.. But if mediocre, amoral men sail through into positions of power with much fanfare, not sure why the standard should be different for women. Women should be allowed the leeway to be bad elected officials. We need to understand that if the standard is equal…