The E90 was heavy? No shit?

Pretty much. They’re so concerned about just making it “more” with every generation they’ve lost their identity. There’s always the M2, that one will be fatter next gen as well.

Engine, turbocharging, more luxurious interior, more motors for things like seats, more plush seating, better sound deadening, stiffer chassis, etc. etc. etc. etc.

So bigger, heavier, slightly better looking. Nothing to see here except the long, slow decline of the 3 series as the best sports sedan. 

Chassis is probably a bit lighter too. I’d challenge that an I4 block and crank isn’t a TON lighter than a 6.  Plus I think the 6 was also turboed. 

That’s a fair point. The changes were minimal, but can you show me if it was chassis weight or just weight from downsizing motors + turbocharging?

I mean, that the trend is heavier and bigger doesn’t mean that’s a good direction. I think this is sort of already happening, but I anticipate that instead of horsepower manufacturers may shift to making things lighter. When a KIA worth 20k less than your car is within shouting distance of your power output, you need…

Current CS is still 3500 lbs. Not as beefy as some of them, but that’s still fairly heavy.

First question I would have is, how much weight? If it is 200-300 lbs net then they have a winner. Can’t wait to see a lighter M3 for once.

It’s never the processor on these things. It’s the battery. And doesn’t Apple refuse to change the battery if they decide the phone is too battered or beat up?

“The industrial revolution” isn’t an argument.

I think you need to work on your reading comprehension:

Another person who has problem with reading comprehension. The point of that comment was that there isn’t a mathematical equation. So....not math based. Sorry this seems to be hard for you. 

What are you talking about dude? Who was talking about math, and who was talking about a perfect system? I said economists create theories based on perfect markets, which don’t exist.

Lol. What does that even mean? Do you think if they could automate harvests that aren’t already automated, they wouldn’t have? You’re saying things with zero objective fact, data or proof. You’ve swallowed a bunch of “common sense” political rhetoric like a fool.

I’ll never ever get Hulu because I want everything Comcast (AKA - The Worst Company *TM) to burn in a fire.

Do you have any data to support this plan? Or are you just typing things that you think? 42% of all workers earn less than $15 bucks an hour. I want to hear this plan you have to automate all their jobs. And then another plan analyzing how we would get that 42% back to work.

For me, I just can't get over the right hand drive thing. Are any of these left hand drive?

Christ. Did you read the assumptions in the theories you sent? All of these theories assume perfectly competitive markets, which is why even economists make jokes about economic theories - the spherical cow in a vacuum.

Please. Do tell me how the economy works. Also. While you’re at it. Tell me the mathematical equation that decides what a salary should be based on the work someone is doing.