Zokajo
kokozo
3/17/17
3:45 PM
31

The point is, obviously, that sending a seizure-inducing gif to a person with epilepsy is a physical assault, causing real-time, physical harm. But you know that...

3/17/17
3:30 PM
15

What’s your point exactly? Sending someone something intended to harm them is sending someone to harm them. What difference does it make what medium you use?

3/17/17
3:23 PM
71

...But nobody is arguing differently? I haven’t seen anybody here argue that women who are harassed shouldn’t be taken seriously. You’re arguing a point nobody disputed. I did point out that legally, Quinn and Eichenwald are regarded as different because his case would be classified as an actual assault, whereas her’s Read more

3/17/17
3:12 PM
149

No, but I do think the article minimized the seriousness of what occurred. A seizure can be fatal, given the right circumstances (one of the primary killers of epileptics is falls they sustain when they’re triggered). What happened to this man is very, very serious and the person who did it deserves to be arrested. Read more

3/17/17
3:11 PM
23

It is when you’ve got an agenda to make him look shitty in the comments of a story in which he was physically attacked and his assailant, arrested.

3/17/17
3:06 PM
182

Yeah, I’m disappointed too. It’s not a zero-sum game. We can (and should) be glad that Eichenwald is seeing justice for the assault perpetrated against him AND also want the Gamergate asshole meninists who perpetrate online assaults against women to receive the same justice.

3/17/17
3:01 PM
37

“What [this person] did with his Twitter message was no different from someone sending a bomb in the mail” Read more

3/17/17
2:59 PM
590

This headline is so misleading and it’s so, so shameful of you to frame the situation like this. The GIF caused him a seizure. He’s epileptic. Yes, that is assault when you do something with the intent of hurting someone else, whether it’s just a GIF. That troll put him in danger knowingly. Epileptic seizures are Read more

6/14/16
12:00 PM
3

Suppose a single hex tears, but the rest of the condom is undamaged. Is the condom wearer any less in danger of getting an infection? How about the partner being penetrated? Read more

6/14/16
11:51 AM
1

I cannot even begin to imagine a worse choice for your condom spokesman than Charlie Sheen.

6/14/16
11:40 AM
6

“more form-fitting manner than regular condoms, though I did not find this to be the case.” Read more

6/14/16
11:27 AM
5

Yeahhhh, I feel like the demographic that is most at risk for unsafe sex is pretty unserved by making condoms more expensive.