And the Pepsi ad was funny in that the premise was they were looking at the new can design.

The premise of the Pepsi ads was they were looking at the new can, not the woman.

“For instance, it is standard across journalism to clearly mark paid advertising, and never to publish dubious sponsored posts anonymously.”

He was funny. Look at that monologue again. The crack about Apple and the sweatshops is what led to the hypocrisy call-out, and it was spot on. 

Is no one going to point out that you can see Lara Trump’s nipple?

Her damn nipple is showing.

There’s the anti-man angle this piece was missing.

The Times piece could use the perspective of an outside expert. Your piece could use being completely deleted.

None of the articles I’ve seen on this describe the evidence against him. There has to be some or he wouldn’t have been convicted. Why do none of the reports on his pardon say what it is?

True. But discrimination is discrimination. This is similar to the women-only screening of Wonder Woman. Understandable and not necessarily problematic in and of itself, but it still discriminates based on gender, therefore it is illegal.

I think it is more a ploy to point out to women that they are guilty of what they are opposed to men doing. 

Women have been against single-gender spaces for decades and now can’t understand why a single-gender space might be a problem. Ironic.

Why didn’t USA Today identify the players? Does that not also protect them?

This was well said, but please leave out the first-person stuff. The writers on this site aren’t journalists. If you worked at a traditional news outlet, that would become very clear before your first day was even over.

Every night on his show he calls it the “sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and groupthink.” It’s in keeping with the conservative rhetoric of telling people you aren’t exactly what you are. 

Seriously. This is very disjointed and confusing. Jezebel has a long history of not caring about anything other than their own thoughts. That’s fine in the dumbass Dirt Bag, but you need at least some kind of reporting standard for serious topics like this one.

It also sounds as if she actually was an assistant on the team at the time, so she wasn’t really acting.

ESPN has a women in the studio and has had a woman call play-by-play for NFL games.

I don’t understand why she wouldn’t be willing to identify him. She’s clearly willing to talk about it and identifying the guy is the only way there are any repercussions for him, which I thought was the whole point about speaking up about abuse.

There’s a scene where they a discussing a climber’s death and the guy’s wife and he says “what did she expect?” And the girlfriend got mad because she said she didn’t expect that. My thought was “you should” because the only thing that going to stop him is dying. She probably thinks that he will accomplish a goal and…