Really? Because I copy and pasted your exact quote. If you didn’t mean to say what you wrote because you didn’t think it through in some kind of stream of consciousness thing or something fine, but I think I paraphrased pretty accurately.

So you didn’t say “But the Hyde Amendment is not about the right to get an abortion - it is about payment for it. Therefore I argue that the Hyde amendment does not “Chip away at abortion rights.”?

Yes, lets worry about what the next POTUS may or may not do. Meanwhile vulnerable women continue to not have access to abortion services.

Its called “paraphrasing”.

Since when do solutions need to be acceptable to all sides?

Can you explain to the class how exactly states could force doctors to work at abortion clinics if they are told that they can only charge X% of what they used to charge for the procedure?

I read the whole thing the first time.  Saying “I want every woman to have the choice to get an abortion regardless of their finances, but not paying for them for the most vulnerable doesn’t chip away at their right to choose.” isn’t a nuanced argument. Its a hollow one. Its like saying “Everyone has the right to an…

Really? Not being able to afford a commercial doesn’t prevent someone from exercising their right to free speech. If a person can’t afford an abortion it functionally prevents them from exercising their right to choose because they can’t pay for one.

I can’t wait to see Warren mop the floor with everyone in the debates. She is by far the best candidate running, and I think there is a real good chance that the primary gets very interesting once everyone gets on the debate stage.

But the Hyde Amendment is not about the right to get an abortion - it is about payment for it. Therefore I argue that the Hyde amendment does not “Chip away at abortion rights.”

Because if there’s anything voters love, it’s a weak, ineffective opposition that makes threats and then fails to follow through on them.

Of all the people on twitter Chris Evans is the one who is worthy of an article?

It’s bad enough that your arguments against the minimum wage at best could be seen as just someone who has no idea what they are talking about, but this? This is approaching tinfoil hat territory.

Reread. I never said the cost of things doubled. I said the price everything goes up by twice as much.

First, they’re not in lockstep. A change to one is not immediately reflected in a change to the other. Second, it has not been done in more than a handful of locations.

No it was communicated correctly.  They don’t have balls to sit on.

It boggles my mind that guys like Schumer are afraid that fighting too hard will hurt the party when its worked like a charm for the GOP.

Sanders also called on Walmart to add hourly employees to its corporate board, a move to give workers a voice—and the means to exercise power—within the company.

And then the price of everything they buy will go up by twice as much, and they’ll be that much worse off.