That said, Trump’s handling of the hurricane was awful.

A) Good. If only the morons that voted for Stein in WI, MI and PA had done the same. Funny story: The number of votes that went to Stein in those three states was greater than Trump’s margin of victory over Clinton.

You have it backwards. The people that are going to help Trump get elected again are the same ones who helped him beat HRC in 2016. Its the ones that don’t understand that the presidential election is a binary choice no matter they much you cry about the system. Meanwhile you sit at home, or worse vote third party,…

A) Blaming Clinton is missing the point. What she did or did not do is irrelevant. You either wanted Trump in the White House (with multiple lifetime appointments to the SCOTUS on the line), or you didn’t. If you did not vote for Hillary you helped Trump just as much as some racist right wing zealot who got conned…

Then it wouldn’t be Bernie, and the correct choice would be the 2020 democratic nominee.  How does that make me someone who is going to get us Trump again?

What kind of mental gymnastics have brought you to that conclusion?

A) No it didn’t. Had the drum been beaten loudly enough Clinton wouldn’t have lost WI, MI and PA by a margin less than the number of morons who voted for Stein.

The only choice in 2020 is the democrat that ends up getting the nomination.

This drum needs to be beaten, and beaten loudly from now until November 2020. Support your primary candidate, have the debate, but once the nomination happens, whomever it may be, pull your head out of your ass and vote for the Democrat.

Not sure what you’re getting at, but loved that movie.

Which was what Nadler did in his statement.

Great use of everyone’s time!

He probably can’t spell coup, so can we start quoting what he says with the way he would spell the words?

If getting the answers to HOW a politician plans to implement these grand designs into law is considered impossible then maybe you are right.

Or you could take your own advice and stop trying to do things that are impossible?

There are a lot of echoes around here almost every article in fact. People like me are simply asking how to realistically implement these utopian policies without magical thinking and realistic outcomes.

I have not seen anyone state that the Dems will hold a filibuster majority in the Senate anytime soon. Even getting the majority will be difficult according to those that study this far more often than I do.

So to recap...you don’t actually have any evidence of a large sunk cost fallacy backlash to this plan (you did say you could be wrong), you have evidence that the Dems won’t take the presidency and the senate while holding the house, and yet we shouldn’t even propose something like this because its too hard to get…