I didn’t miss the point. I countered with the fact that Twitter isn’t representative of the votion population as a whole. You might be interested in the demographics of the user base to see why it’s an invalid measure of overall sentiment even in the Democrat base.

Well it’s a good thing that we elect people on the ratio on Twitter isn’t it? So I guess it’s settled then.

The only way this would ever work is if it is retroactive to placate those who paid their loans off the way they were suppose to because those people will demand their piece of the pie or will walk away from it enough to tank the support.

Its no China-people.

Its not that hard...it means that if you break the law severely enough you lose some rights, like being able to vote, that you would normally have until you’ve served your sentence.

Because people who commit felonies should have to repay their debt to society before they are allowed to be part of it again.

Every single convicted felon who serves their sentence should be able to vote, but not while serving that sentence. They need to serve their debt to society first.

No need to worry about debt if it’s free or pretty damn close to it.

Its not a matter of how safe their seats would be.  Its a matter of efficacy as a public servant.  Bernie or Warren can do more to advance the progressive cause in the Senate than they could as VP.

Good policy makes good government.

She is the most impressive candidate so far.  I would love to see her debate Trump.

More than enough to immediately start the impeachment process.

You Can’t Support Press Freedom Without Supporting Julian Assange.

So if someone else can free-load off of their union, how can I prevent the company I work for from spending money on political activities that they made from my service to my employer?

And so a Republican politician salivating over CEOs and then asking them, during a congressional hearing, very politely to denounce an alternative in which unelected heads of banks hold all of the levers of the U.S. economy is...well, the best possible advertisement for socialism you could ask for.

You should be embarrassed by this take.

He’s not blaming society’s ills on a class of people. He is blaming society’s ills on the system that allows for that class of people to exist at the expense of everyone else.

Seems like there’s a lesson to be learned here about candidate recruitment, but I just can’t put my finger on what that might be.

You are assuming that you can retroactively apply a removal of the Senate to just one specific period without any further context.

I didn’t make any leaps...