The only choice in 2020 is the democrat that ends up getting the nomination.

This drum needs to be beaten, and beaten loudly from now until November 2020. Support your primary candidate, have the debate, but once the nomination happens, whomever it may be, pull your head out of your ass and vote for the Democrat.

Not sure what you’re getting at, but loved that movie.

Which was what Nadler did in his statement.

Great use of everyone’s time!

He probably can’t spell coup, so can we start quoting what he says with the way he would spell the words?

If getting the answers to HOW a politician plans to implement these grand designs into law is considered impossible then maybe you are right.

Or you could take your own advice and stop trying to do things that are impossible?

There are a lot of echoes around here almost every article in fact. People like me are simply asking how to realistically implement these utopian policies without magical thinking and realistic outcomes.

I have not seen anyone state that the Dems will hold a filibuster majority in the Senate anytime soon. Even getting the majority will be difficult according to those that study this far more often than I do.

So to recap...you don’t actually have any evidence of a large sunk cost fallacy backlash to this plan (you did say you could be wrong), you have evidence that the Dems won’t take the presidency and the senate while holding the house, and yet we shouldn’t even propose something like this because its too hard to get…

I didn’t miss the point. I countered with the fact that Twitter isn’t representative of the votion population as a whole. You might be interested in the demographics of the user base to see why it’s an invalid measure of overall sentiment even in the Democrat base.

Well it’s a good thing that we elect people on the ratio on Twitter isn’t it? So I guess it’s settled then.

The only way this would ever work is if it is retroactive to placate those who paid their loans off the way they were suppose to because those people will demand their piece of the pie or will walk away from it enough to tank the support.

Its no China-people.

Its not that hard...it means that if you break the law severely enough you lose some rights, like being able to vote, that you would normally have until you’ve served your sentence.

Because people who commit felonies should have to repay their debt to society before they are allowed to be part of it again.

Every single convicted felon who serves their sentence should be able to vote, but not while serving that sentence. They need to serve their debt to society first.