Retroactively changing election results by gerrymandering after an election would 100% violate the constitution.

Lets be honest...Michael was NeverNotii running for President.

What if one of those states has some Republicans in power at that moment or even after the Republican loses but could still win the EC - can they just repeal the Interstate Voting Compact in that moment?

I’m arguing House representation needs to be tied to the population. Not Senate representation. I actually don’t have a problem with the way the Senate is set up in that its a check on the House.  For instance without it the ACA would have been repealed 100 times over.

Its in the Wikipedia link I posted.

They’re getting close...less than 100 electoral votes to go and 69 votes with pending legislation.

I think a better solution to the House representation issue is to set the minimum Representative to population ratio to the smallest state by population.

The essay is great, but any time someone brings abolishing the Senate my eyes can’t roll any farther back into my head. Its the non-starter of non-starters. You will never convince small states to hand over their check of the house, nor senators to vote themselves out of existence. Arguing to abolish the Senate takes…

Its gonna take more than unionizing. We need to mandate labor representation on corporate boards, change the tax code to benefit labor and re-investment, break up some companies that are too big, and change the business culture from one that only considers shareholders to one that considers stakeholders.

As a non-lawyer, I’ll be the first to admit that I haven’t the faintest idea what sort of 11th dimensional meta-chess President Donald Trump and his legal team are playing at these days.

I don’t think this criticism is very well thought out considering it was a reasonable answer to the question, and that the answer you wanted him to give was to a question that wasn’t asked.

Vote for the person you agree with. Thank you.

Honest, serious question about this...

I read this morning that a federal ban on subsidies may not survive the SCOUTS (the question was asked once in a case involving OH, but the court punted and decided the plaintiffs didn’t have standing).  An easier solution is taxing the incentives at 100% at the federal level therefore making them meaningless.

This is a dumb thing to be furious about. First, the joke was about his appearance as a result of being injured while serving. Its hypocritical to rip Trump for attacking a gold star family or saying he likes war heroes who don’t get captured if we don’t hold everyone to that standard.

I mean it would be one thing if the meme was actually relevant to the argument I’m making, but its not. Your intellectual dishonesty and gross inability to understand nuance is on par with a certain FOX News host actually. Keep posting cartoons though.

That Houston trade was awful though. All of the picks would have been at the bottom of the first round, and all of those contracts are guaranteed.

Oh hey, the old “I can’t actually refute any of your points so here’s a meme” response.

Let’s do a quick recap: Tucker Carlson now has sympathy from both the right AND left, Tucker Carlson is still on tv and now he gets to use his sympathy card to further the narrative that the left is nothing but mobs, Tucker Carlson now gets to continue to exaggerate the severity of the protest, an anti-racism group…