Why not just Gary Oldman. He's amazing, and I like to think people know who he is by now.

Well played! *like*

For me the cliffhanger worked brilliantly, but the solution didn't. Especially since it wasn't really explained why it happened. I get it now (the Observers were trying to prevent Etta from being born) but at the time it was really confusing.

Wow you have a fan. Almost carbon copied your article, only added some things from the comments on top: http://www.dagbladet.no/2012/11/21/nyheter/utenriks/nazismen/hitler/tyskland/24488340/

I mainly remember descriptions of dresses and Nynaeve tugging her braid, broken up by the occational action sequence.

I'm sorry, what did you say?

I guess they got better again. I gave up on WoT around 2003...

Also because all those combustion driven vehicles filled with people need a lot of oxygen compared to say 8 or 10 people walking through on their own.

That would have been amazing. Restart the whole show to begin with Miles beginning to have doubts about his role in the militia. Cue some well placed flashbacks to how he got there, end season 1 with the failed assassination. Completely diverge from there on out. Never fail to keep him a grumpy badass.

"...the movie is much more intent of Brad Pitt running around playing hero."

And I was so happy about the glimpse of the particle collider from last week. Felt like it was really going somewhere.

Nope. Had me howling with frustration.

Especially since there's no way I can see Charlie as a strong lead. Miles is growing more and more into that role.

It's like they're not sure whether they're going for Snow White and the Huntsman or The Princess Bride, end ended up with a demon hybrid of them.

God I hated the "running out of oxygen" thing. There is no way they run out of oxygen in a space that big, especially since there is no way it's air tight. And if they were running out of oxygen there is no way they start hallucinating but still keep walking for an hour. Someone please write Kripke and tell him that…

Ah. I am too, but figured you might be younger. Guess it's just about 1. your tastes in entertainment and reading and internet stuff and 2. what you came across in education and work...

You're not dumb, just not well informed. I mean, I had at least heard about five or six of these by the time I was 16 or so. My mum had kids' biographies about Marie Curie and Thomas Edison at home. And I remember seeing Cousteau's shows on tv. And Mendelev and Bohr and Einstein were mentioned in school. So I guess I…

Well, I linked to the part that says he won a couple of awards for scientific writing... And there was a link to a (short) list of errors.

This looks like a good place to start finding out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_short_history_of_nearly_everything#Awards_and_reviews

I was thinking about that too. It's a great read, and very illuminating.