*hugs*

I'm not sure we're allowed to tell people to get bent in the comments, but just in case we are, "get bent".

Actually not true anymore. Language DOES change and even BBC standard English now allows for a singular, genderless 'they'.

Is there a link for the second photo?

Wait. "7 feet tall dog", but "7 foot cat"? Are you suggesting a... septacat?

It depends on the class. I didn't realize that my marketing prof's statement that "15% of your grade will be due to participation on the online forums" meant "you will post a comment on every article or you will get 0% for that part of the grade". I assumed that it would be based on the quality of comments/depth of…

I think the biggest miss in the original comment is here:

Well, CLEARLY, that's why Clare is the problem and has to go.

I was, and no, it doesn't.

I don't agree. As a programmer, I say that it is totally not comprehensible.

Bullshit. "Whether is Heather attempting a suicide" is not a predicate. It's ill-formed and not a reasonable question to use to assess the knowledge of a student.

Bullshit. No, it's poorly written and a terrible exam question regardless of content. There's no way to assess the ability of the student based on whether or not they can understand that.

Coconut oil is surprisingly not greasy if you get the amount right! I shower twice a day b/c I feel grimy a lot of the time and b/c I _hate_ having the feel of stuff on my skin (making bread by hand almost kills me - get it off! get it OFF!).

I have cotton gloves used for kneading bread dough.

Instead of a "disaster recovery plan", we use the term The Simpsons did: "Marge, prepare the emergency ham!"

Nope. "prusten", not purr. Similar, but without the flexible hyoid bone in the larynx I believe.

Go read more.

And was she?

I haven't missed the point of it - you seem to have decided that the subject of the article was the person rather than the product. That's not what the inventor wanted and that's not what the author agreed to when initially contacting the inventor.

If the science credentials are fraudulent, then it doesn't reflect well on the science itself.