I think "unions" and "families" are very different things. What a family is, is pretty straightforward, but I'm pretty sure any form of sex is considered a union, whether it formed a lasting "union" (in the more modern, "marriage-y" way) or it was just a rape, it was still a [sexual] union.

I think this was the first actual problem I've had (managed to "star it" successfully here on this page). A lot of annoyances ("yay, instead of dragging the comment box so I can write a comment while reading the article, now I have to type in one spot and can't read the article while I'm doing it! Such improvement!"…

She's give or take a legal adult, and, more importantly, a consenting adult in the state of New York. They both seemed to be into it (based on what was presented here). Who are you to judge?

On the one hand, this seems really cool and smart and great and useful and logical... but I don't have an Xbox (at least not one of the fancy new ones, but I'm guessing these apps won't be making it to the original Xbox), I don't have a Windows Phone, and I basically never use any of those stupid apps on my Windows 8…

The only ones I think are any actual improvement would be putting mono-apps on the taskbar (though I doubt I'd ever use that, would be great for anyone who did) and having the power functions on the Start menu (seriously, I had to Google how to turn off my own computer before I learned how to do that). The rest... if…

I want to click the star on your post to support it, but apparently clicking that just opens the replies and doesn't star it. Not cool, neo-Kinja! But yeah, I'm with you.

You people are ruining Windows 8!!

Please... please just don't. There are those of us who love The IT Crowd and love Community and love Joel McHale who have been fighting this ever seeing the light of day (even though it has been available on the internet for a long time), and publicity like this really makes our jobs hard. Look, we all love the…

You know what would be great? If I could slide this commenting box around as I scroll through this large article, so I could comment on sections as I look at them, instead of having to remember everything I want to say at the end. You know, like the old Kinja let me do, before this "improvement". Luckily, I can read…

How does Doctor Who come into this? I feel extremely misled by the title!

Are both participants aware of the rules of the game? Is the person deciding the dividing point allowed to reiterate them? Because it seems like very few people would be willing to refuse any offer, because refusal means they get nothing, and nothing is always less than more-than-nothing.

I think I'm going to come out for Team Jordan. Reserving the right to change at a later date.

A long-time, good friend of mine has a band. They aren't particularly big (though they certainly are bigger and better than I'd expected them to be so quickly), they don't have roadies unloading their stuff, they don't play to hundreds or thousands of people, I don't think they've signed any sorts of agreements with…

Excluding the highway that passes through my city, there are only three surface streets in the city that pass over to the next city over because of a large river. One is a two-lane road (a "highway" a long time ago, but now a rather scenic and slow route), a four-lane road in my city but I'm pretty sure it drops to…

I'm going to have to say that theory of "induced demand" does not exist everywhere, and it might even exclusively exist in a small amount of places where highways exist.

I think we understand "induced demand" well enough to know it doesn't really apply here. People don't drive on the Gardiner because it's there, they drive there because they have to get to work in Toronto but cannot afford/don't want to live in Toronto. Getting rid of the Gardiner won't not change anything because…

If I understand the article correctly, those people only drive on the Gardiner because of "induced demand" so if you get rid of the highway, everyone will just find different roads and traffic will remain the same...

Hey guys at Kotaku, I don't come around much, so please do forgive me if the subject to this post is simply so universally known that it doesn't have to be explained, but I'm pretty sure it's considered bad journalism (or just bad writing) to write something about a subject, but never actually say what that subject is…

Send, yes, but there ain't much to send. Boring "where are you" and "be there in 5" texts. No exciting web history, Instagram, chat messages, Facebook, or anything else fun for them to spy on.

Well, I mean, I don't have a smartphone, so they definitely aren't spying on that, and while I expect them to spy on my phone, I rarely use it so they probably wouldn't get much, and my computer... well... they'll definitely get more than they bargained for there.