You just avoided addressing both points made in my post.

It obviously is it. I notice the fact that you still do not want to answer

Horrible idea. If every country operated that way, then many millions of people would never have the option to hold office...through no choice or action of their own.

The easiest way is to quote your post. The fact that you refused to answer despite my interest proves my point.

You’re not being truthful. If your interest were actually conditional upon me “having a sincere interest in getting answers from me about your questions.”, then you would already be interested and have answered instead of refusing.

Why don’t you demonstrate that you have an interest by answering?

You’re a good reason why responsible, law-abiding people should carry a firearm

Obviously wrong. Were your statement accurate, then you’d be answering instead of refusing to answer

So, in fact, you still choose to refuse to answer. Obviously you’re not yet interested

Your lack of interest has nothing to do with me. Why pretend otherwise?

So your lack of interest still hasn’t changed. I’ll be around if that changes

You just keep proving that you don’t want to answer. I’ll be around if that ever changes

So you continue to prove your lack of interest. Let me know if that ever changes

So you’re still not interested in answering or discussing. I’m around if that ever changes

And you could prove that you’re actually interested in conversing by answering my questions and being honest. So far, you’ve refused both of those things.

So you still choose to lie about my posts in order to distract from your refusal to answer. Sorry to see that you still have nothing to contribute

“I’m refusing to answer until you settle on a single answer.”

You have firmly established your refusal to answer.

So you’re still afraid to answer the questions. I’ll be here if that ever changes

“Okay, show me the time I said “I cared so much that I didn’t bother”, the line in question.”