jrhmobile
jrhmobile
jrhmobile

Get a Prius.

There could be a host of reasons (generally speaking)...

Have you looked at housing costs in any major US city recently?

Uber might pay you to stop driving, in the same way a drug dealer might pay for your first sample. But once you get hooked on their services, well, that is when the cost starts to go right up.

Amazon, that’s your current store too.  Minus the discount that is.

I doubt it will play out this way, but it would be great if they would put all their all-caps alphabet soup Chinese drop ship brands on this other platform.

This is a very simple situation.

Then I’m sure the next drink had something in it besides beer. Karma is a bitch. 

So this guy is building a following by being an asshole? Straight out of the Trump playbook.

They used to have a headquarters in the East Village but were gentrified out of it and moved to the Bronx. Fun fact: Bakersfield has a higher crime rate than San Francisco. 

No, it shouldn’t be up to the customer. So you’re going to let wait staff starve in order to die on that hill. Which makes you a good and decent person. Oh no, um, wait... <eyeroll>

I had no idea how many stingy heartless slacktivist bastards there were on Gizmodo.

“I’m not tipping... so my money is only going to the one person who actually controls wages and makes their employees rely on tips. Take that!”

Let’s see him go to a strip club and watch the dancers but make everyone else pony up bills.

I make a living bartending in Los Angeles and rely on tips to survive. I have to say I wouldn’t mind having a minute alone to influence this influencer.

Yeah, I sure restaurant owners and politicians are really taking notice. Like all anti--tipping crusaders they’re just one more cheap lowlife.

Go be a cunt somewhere else, universalamander.

If we want companies to pay their workers a living wage, we’ll have to make it a law to do so. Sounds like voting blue will be the only path to that.

It frustrates me to no end that the current refrain is that the best way to resolve unfair pay practices towards financially vulnerable restaurant employees is to exacerbate it by stiffing said employees. Like, what the fuck do you expect them to do, just quit and hope like hell they find a better paying job?

This SC does suck for a variety of reasons largely related to being bought and paid for by the R party and social zealots. This decision however does’nt ‘focus on a technicality’, the whole thing is a technicality outlining proper court procedure and the meaning of censorship in US legal terms. You’d know that if you