johndoe85
johndoe85
johndoe85

A personal opinion does not have to meet the same standard as a legal decision. If a person thinks Kobe raped someone, they can call him a rapist. If a person thinks OJ murdered someone, they can call him a murderer. If a girl or boy thinks they were raped at a party but don't report it to the police they can still

Uh...yes. Yes it would. It puts their motivations in context. It helps give the outside reader a better understanding of the actions taken, develop a thoughtful opinion on what the response should be, and their appropriate role. Why are you so against a complete understanding of the issue, and why does saying that

*practitioners of Islam

My point was that the perpetrators are Islam. I pointed out specific things they did that showed they were Muslim. This isn't an argument about Christianity, or a debate about Islam. It was showing how the people involved with this incident were Muslim, and you can't pretend or act like they aren't.

Ohhh I like this. Real Muslims only fit your definition of Muslims. Please read the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. People are Muslim if they follow Islam or stay they do. Full stop. You can't pick and choose which people follow a religion, and no one but the religious followers can decide what religion they belong to.

Uh...what? These terrorists are much more like Christians than Muslims?

Yep. So lets yell and get angry at her now that she has. Definitely a positive response.

I'm really liking this new superiority complex that the Jezebel authors seem to be getting. Like they are better than everyone and it's a shock when other people aren't idiots.

Shhhh shhh shhh...it's ok to body snark when jezebel does it. Didn't you get the memo?

*Buzzer Sound* Wrong. A- for the insults. Always attack the speaker, it makes you look good.

It is clearly not unconstitutional. It is a private organisation banning it's members (or those who want to stay members) from associating with fraternities. It has no government based responsibility to provide freedom of association.

My only solace with hearing the German national anthem at F1 this year is that I don't have to listen to the f*cking thing twice every race (I know, I know, the Austrian anthem only SOUNDS the same). It's also nice to hear My Country Tis of Thee after races now too (yes, I'm aware).

Ah, so you paid taxes the first year at the old assessment price, and this year you paid at the new assessed value under your name. That makes sense.

Uh....there are state laws that limit the amount of housing assessment increases on a year to year basis, so unless it went up due to a tax rate increase, you should have challenged that valuation. And you'd have won.http://www.hcad.org/Help/CappedVal…

He isn't speeding through because of speed traps, he's speeding through because if you're a person of color it isn't a good idea to even stop for gas in the town. Racist sh*tbags.

Vidor is a sh*thole of a town that deserves to be eliminated (by dissolution and forcing it's residents to leave). What a racist hellhole.

On that McQueen story.. that actually sounds kind of awesome. You treat it like a joke to him, but he picked a reliable car that actually did almost win. While he was in a cast. You can't call someone out for #10 worst gentlemen driver when they 1) Don't suck at driving 2) Finish 2nd.

Expendables 3 is going to be awesome. Just like the first 2 were awesome. Embrace the terrible but awesome action movie. No Bruce in the 3rd one.

People will watch terrible action movies with male protagonists. Terrible action movies with female protagonists do not get watched. So yes, consumers are biased. They won't watch terrible movies with women as much as they will with men. Why is this? I have no idea. Case in point: Any of the fast / furious

In this instance I'm sure that Hillary knew it was a parody account and didn't care