johndoe85
johndoe85
johndoe85

I'm inclined to agree, but I honestly have no idea. I've never looked into it because I don't smoke or plan to pick it up. Apparently MD Anderson doesn't know either (http://www.mdanderson.org/newsroom/news-…). So...safer than cigarettes, but nothing known beyond that.

As healthy as oral sex eh? Well they can both cause cancer! Ba dum tsch (do e-cigs still cause cancer?)

Ok...not gonna lie...the scuba diving in a meat suit could be kind of fun if you got to wear one of those chainmail suits underneath and were in a cage. THINK OF ALL THE SHARKS YOU'D SEE.

Maybe she had horrible experiences in middle school and it stuck with her throughout life so now she associates more with men and can't get over the emotional abuse suffered at the hands of bullies? Benefit of the doubt and all that.

That bunny cup, it is awesome.

Lol, best use of THANKS OBAMA that I've seen.

Congratulations! You're strong! Stronger than me! The point of the above is that an average man will be stronger than an average women, and that if men and women work out, men will be stronger (that one is also over an average), and that at peak physical capability men will be stronger (see: Olympics). This takes

Yeah. This is a total 180 from the Bush administrations AID's policies....oh...oh wait. Well at least he finally got on board. YAY.

Ah trollolololing, some do it better than others. I suggest more practice.

What stupidity, specifically? You seem to love the ad hominem attack, and purposeful ambiguity, but you should really be more clear. It's hard to refute ad hominem attacks when done so generically. I suppose that's the point of them, but it isn't so effective as an argument tactic. Is it my sarcasm that upsets

Yeah, it's not like men are, you know usually stronger and faster than women. Oh, wait, yes, yes they are. Stop being obtuse and accept that nature has resulted in different physical abilities for men and women. It's why there are different sports leagues and split competitions.

I think you didn't get it. The army memo doesn't state that women are too pretty to take seriously, it states that the public perception OUTSIDE OF THE ARMY is that pretty women don't do real work, so they should use pictures from actual deployments etc. It's a condemnation of the public, not the army. Jackie

Say you can't go, send a gift. If you want to go but don't want to go to a standard party, offer to help plan it and make a boozy affair with cake and costumes (aka a party : p). It is okay with me if women don't go. That's the whole idea, you can do what you want!

I dunno, killing fits right in with the gentlemen of the middle ages through 1923 or so. They did a lot of killing back then.

Meh. All presidents lie and make the average persons life miserable.

I was trying to make the point that kids DO choose between "jocks" and "nerds". They self segregate by interests, and choose classes, that "jocks" take or "nerds" take. The class descriptions (jock, nerd) are arbitrary, but the underlying factor (self-segregation into groups) is the same regardless of nomenclature.

If he would have been annoyed at you not having the party, a condition of having the party should have been "then you do all of this crap that we both hate with me so it gets done faster and we both suffer less than if we did it on our own." He wasn't required to do registering or attend the party because you didn't

Most people find friends in their elective classes (like, say marching band), not in the random class they get assigned to.

Or the airline could have forced you to rush off the plane and make a mad dash to your next flight because the 1 hour layover you scheduled is now 10 minutes because the flight got delayed and they won't hold planes. Whichever. Just now

Or the airline could have forced you to rush off the plane and make a mad dash to your next flight because the 1 hour layover you scheduled is now 10 minutes because the flight got delayed and they won't hold planes. Whichever.