Like I said to other posters... the 1st Amendment doesn’t protect her from ESPN firing her for making the company look bad.
Like I said to other posters... the 1st Amendment doesn’t protect her from ESPN firing her for making the company look bad.
Calling trump, a public figure, a racist is not anywhere near defamatory.
You say it is a reasonable take... but the dozen people calling me an idiot would disagree.
thanks
I’m pretty sure if ESPN fired her, she could make a decent argument that she was fired because the government punished her for her beliefs.
I agree.
cool
See my response to C.A. Pinkham.
See my response to C.A. Pinkham.
See my response to C.A. Pinkham.
See my response to C.A. Pinkham.
**Looks up the Third Amendment**
I’m not arguing about that. This whole post was about what ESPN employees were saying, and Siamese.Citys seemed to be arguing that the First Amendment protected her comments from punishment by ESPN. It doesn’t.
I am going to be that guy- This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. She is free to say Trump is a racist. And ESPN, a private company, is free to fire her/punish her/do nothing to her if it feels like it.
I am more impressed by the packed house. The Marlins would be jealous.
I play with myself all the time when I have nothing else to do
The big broad proposal is the easy part. Developing a plan that achieves it is not easy at all. It will require broad tax increases for every American (which is fine- as long as Bernie and everyone pushing it is honest about it).
Let the one who has not gotten drunk and wandered into a stranger’s apartment with no pants cast the first stone.
He does understand a thing or two about mashing monster dongs
Isn’t that the normal attendance for Rays games?