Uhhhh but isn't it, like, federal law that all companies have to accommodate people with disabilities?

you win.

nooooooot an excuse though? regular cab drivers/uber drivers: from a humanistic standpoint there should be absolutely no difference but OBVIOUSLY there is.

RAPEY CABS. UGH but I also know what you're talking about.

truth.

I agree, but some people specifically feel the need—for whatever reason—to walk around and go outside. It's cathartic/healing/formative/simple exercise/etc. We can't deny people or unreasonably restrict access to that freedom. 117 is unreasonable. I would take mass transit, personally, but depending on the specific…

yep

NAILED IT

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

117 is exorbitant. For 10 minutes? Terrible. Offensive.

Maybe he's not drunk and she is missing legs. Presumptuous.

Maybe she was in a wheelchair?

nope.

that is appalling and exorbitant and NO.

This site is actually the worst. I don't get it. Am I supposed to like myself orrrrrrrr...?

Jezebel sucks. We agree. Go away.

RIP patient confidentiality.

on a more positive/less tedious note: I look exactly like one of the ladies in one of those paintings.

love. this.

excellent piece! well done; congratulations; etc. This is wonderful work and critical commentary.