jeepingib
Jeepingib
jeepingib

No, I have to disagree. There are variations on another idea, which would be unique, but not very unique. Whereas these two ideas are not similar to anything else, making them "very" unique. 

Really, an Ad Hominem attack instead of trying to defend your poorly titled article? 

That's a very interesting point of view. So when traveling on a trail and coming across a rock at the bottom of a dip that is 10.5" tall. The Jeep in this situation with a solid axle would clear it with no issue. But the Bronco with its IFS would have less than it's normal clearance because the suspension would be in

All metros should be crushed. There are exactly zero redeeming qualities in those cars. 

Seriously? F you and your judgemental opinion. Especially espousing that BS then talking about karma. 

He needs something fairly reliable that can handle a 50 mile daily commute! I love Mogs, and 4x4 in general. But that is definitely not what this guy needs! 

That's a really dismissive comment. I agree with RelentlessSlacker here. I think that the Boxster is a great car. But this guy said he is on a shoestring budget and needs reliability. That eliminates the Porsche. Miata is a viable alternative in this scenario. 

I think you are grossly underestimating the value here.  With the gears, lockers, suspension, and beadlock capable wheels it offers a ton more than any FX4 package and will likely be priced as such.

You should edit the article to show that the Sasquatch package is only available with the automatic transmission.  Mr. Levine confirmed it on his Twitter earlier.

It’s like you are trying to correct my statement that was already factually correct.  That is pretty damned annoying.

But I did say not available with the granny gear, in anything other than the Badlands package with the 2.3"  Which is saying that yes, it’s available.  But that it is limited.  

That’s exactly what I said.  The point I am trying to make is that it doesn’t have availability with the Sasquatch package, and have it restricted to only one trim.  So it will hardly be available at all with that ratio.  

The Sasquatch package is not available with the manual transmission.  So that would also mean that the 4.7 final drive gears are not available with the granny gear, in anything other than the Badlands package with the 2.3.  These are all pre-production numbers and things are subject to change.  But it seems rather

I crunched my own numbers. I expect that with larger than stock tires, like most Wrangler owners install, it will save 400 dollars a year in fuel. Whether it offsets the total cost enough is up to you though. 

CP. An Alfa from the 90's is not exactly a desirable automobile. The owner is looking for a unicorn buyer. Someone who will appreciate his prized Alfa more than he does. It would be a fun car, but for maybe half as much. 

But Willys bought Bantam before producing the CJ 

Wow, that is a really bad argument to make. The M151 was made by AM General. At the time of the design and manufacture of the M151 AM General was owned by AMC. AMC also owned the Jeep Brand. The M151 was the successor of the M38 which was a military version of the CJ. So what you are suggesting is that Jeep should

The Roxor is a clear design evolution of previous Mahindra Thars. 

It is going to be a similar argument to the case between DaimlerChrysler and General Motors back in 06' over the use of the seven slat grill on the H2 and H3. "DC" sued because they argued that the seven slat grill is the distinguishing charecteristic of the Jeep icon. GM argued that they had every right to use it

Calling it a blatant ripoff is not being very honest though. It is a newer version of the vehicle that they have been building legally with a license to do so for the past 50 years. They did change the grill which is the key point of Jeeps trademark, and the dimensions are different than the CJ. But they are also