Factory run test drive centers could easily replace dealerships IMO. I would test drive more cars but with most dealers they want to jerk your around so much it’s a 3 hour trip just to drive one car and then battle the “what would it take to get you in this car today” nonsense

And yet gun ownership rights have never been less restricted in the history of the nation. Is the persecution complex of gun owners as as that of Christians and White people?

If it’s a tech trying to diagnose an idling issue or a porter taking your car through an automatic carwash, I don’t understand the outrage.

oil change, and AC work. If you need to work out the AC, just let the thing idle. thats the most taxing job for an AC system. There is no reason this car needed a “test drive”

A lot of these test drives are caught on dash-cams. I assume at least 1 Impala owner has a dash-cam. But the point remains the same - it’s my car, not the tech’s. In my personal vehicle I allows drinks but no food (unless double bagged) due to some grease incidents. It’s not the techs job to sit his fucking In n Out…

This guy was caught doing things that are a) outside normal test drive procedures, b) extremely unprofessional, especially with someone else’s property, and c) illegal (speeding). This guy and his employer deserve all the hate they’ll get.

Nothing you posted has changed my low opinion of dealerships.

“Why he tensed up and started acting like a shit head and not being open and honest I do not know.”

A theory somewhat undermined by the dealership owner publicly posting a video saying it was entirely entirely against dealership policy and should never have happened.

good point you cant evenly dispense fresh oil under 100mph

There was also noted concern about the speeds he was going, for what it’s worth.

Lmao. This is what Nissan gets for putting awful CVTs in everything.

I don’t know what you mean; we have 6.

Because 2 ruined races makes for a better product

This is a perfectly acceptable response to blocking at a Kart track. Blocking is the problem there. Not the dump and run.

Lots of people shit on Earnhardt back in the day. People generally don’t speak ill of the dead.

They should follow the guidelines handed down after a scientific study of likelihood of floods in that area. There will be another 500 year flood in the next ten years, because climate change is a fact instead of needing more research to be proven.

Before that question can be answered, you have to determine whether the 100- or 500-year design spec really adds that much to the cost. It may only require hardening the lower levels of an otherwise conventional building; it may be nothing more than site preparation before building a conventional building begins.

2-300 miles should be good for regional distribution in a lot of places. They dont need to replace the long haulers yet, start small and work up to that.

That’s not really a counter argument to what JayFra said: