![](https://i.kinja-img.com/image/upload/c_fit,q_60,w_645/7f89e892bbac368b16badb4ed737f514.jpg)
I believe you’re responding to this statement in RoRoTheGreat’s comment:
I believe you’re responding to this statement in RoRoTheGreat’s comment:
I’m sure this will be PG-13, but that means there’s a slight chance Guenther gets the one allowed F-bomb.
Has Red Bull won seven constructors’ titles? I thought it was six.
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2022, 2023
Verstappen won the WDC in 2021, but Mercedes took the WCC that year.
he decided to give up and head to the now old-school EVGo charger for some CCS2-fed electrons.
...promote the use of safety features, such as seat belts...
*NACS
You don’t like to click three times to go one slide forward?
I was going to say the same thing. There has to be some math that lobbyists got put into the CAFE standards at some point to get way more credit than deserved for the auto manufacturers. 107 MPGe is still awesome and way more efficient than ICE cars. But why would we say 380 MPGe? That’s crazy.
If Jalopnik were around when they introduced seat belts or airbags, I imagine the comment sections would have looked exactly like this one.
That’s not at all what the article is about. It’s about auto manufacturers being able to claim fleet emissions targets (like cap-and-trade credits) if their plug-in cars they’ve sold can be proven to be running on biofuels. It’s not about consumers getting any sort of benefit.
As someone else noted...hence the testing.
Partnerships with the charging networks that can monitor what electricity they are buying from the grid. There are also home chargers that do this for consumers and allow you to choose to only charge when the grid is the “cleanest.”
Don’t we have to start somewhere in every supply chain?
No. Like a small pickup truck.
Oh man. I’m waiting for the full-electric Maverick, but if GM decided to ute-ify the Bolt I would be all over it.
I don’t think a 737 is a widebody.
I think another good idiom is, “don’t feed the troll.”