jasonday
RatherNerdy
jasonday

Completely agree. Even the 1977 cartoon version of the movie (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt007768… - running time 90 minutes) had to repeat scenes to fill the movie (continuous cutaways of the dwarves marching).

The books were very Walden-esque...a bit to much description on the everyday things.

Best Borderlands movie, ever.

I would argue that video game characters would win, because of the construct of the video game. A typical video game is meant to be won, meaning that the protagonist gains powers and abilities throughout quests and boss battles to then be able to meet and beat the final boss. Comic book heroes don't always win and are

My dear, sweet brother Numsie!

My thoughts exactly. No dragon can conclusively know what their eye color is without another dragon saying so.

That's the part I don't buy - If you read the "blue eyes" solution, there are assumptions but no "beyond a doubt" conclusions.

I did read the "Blue eyes" solution: https://xkcd.com/solution.html, and I'm not sure I fully buy the reasoning. To apply that to this puzzle, each dragon would see everyone else has green eyes, and when they don't turn into sparrows assumes that green isn't the green it thought it was, and then thinks that maybe it

They all stay dragons. Assuming all is on the up and up and they can see that the other dragons do indeed have green eyes. Reason being: Each individual dragon can see that all of the other dragons have the same color eyes,(green) but they can't see their own. They each deduce that they must have not have green eyes,

Exactly. This was THE computer going mad.

Easy.

Evil Zelda:

Now playing

I think you forgot about Gymkata, where a gymnast is inexplicably also a ninja.

I do the same - I tend to convey information in emails within bullets/nested points, so that the hierarchy is very clearly visible at a glance. Additionally, it allows users to scan more easily, because we all know no one reads the entire email word for word. In a corporate environment, people are receiving tons of

hype moment.

I felt #9 was trying to be too "cool"; he rubbed me the wrong way. That said, I realize he was coming out of the war and was angry, etc. The Doctor to me, is someone that is very alien, clever, and sometimes funny (but with layers - a super intelligent being that makes a joke, but there are things under the surface of

I think people who were introduced to the Doctor through #9, love him as he was a different spin. That said, I think a lot of us that have been watching since early on (#4 for me) prefer Tenant and/or Smith over Eccleston. If you watch #4, you'll see the similarities. Tenant and Smith touch on #4 and #5, both of which

Every design student, or designer interested in logo/brand design should watch this video. Basic tenants, such as can I tell what it is when it's the size of a dime, are often overlooked.

A lot of "blowing things up" stems from the Doctor manipulating a direct threat from an aggressor against his party to the aggressor itself. Rarely is he directly blowing up Daleks, but more specifically causing Daleks to blow themselves up.