I understand that. But if I was looking at cars in that price range, I'd go for a truck vs. a luxury car.

None of the things you just mentioned have anything to do with practicality. Actually, 2 of them are incorrect!

Exactly. For $60,000, I’d much rather spend my money on a loaded F-150 than a mid trim 5-series. You’ll get just as many, if not more, features, more power, and much more practicality.

I'd rather have $1,500 than a sunroof and extra speakers because a) I'm tall and don't like sunroofs in car and b) I'm not really an audiophile, so I can't tell the difference between sound systems.

This is why we can't have nice things.

The wheels, lower price, and extra power do it for me.

If I were looking in the segment, I'd get an Accord (don't say Mazda6, it's not as practical).

Backup camera is standard on all trims now.

Yes. But still, get the Sport.

My 2 cents: don't buy an Accord EX. The Sport model is the way to go.

That’s not even the new Superb. The new one is even better looking.

Neutral: BRING THE FREAKING EURO PASSAT (and wagon) TO AMERICA!

I don’t know how, but I just realized there’s no “c” in Sportbak.

This is a very good COTD, and I was rooting for this. Congrats to As Du Volant, and good luck to $kay finding a woman anywhere near a Pulsar.

I’ll be honest: I’ve always wanted a BMW X6.

Ferrari Berlinetta Boxer

Fun fact about the Nitro: when Consumer Reports tested it, they literally put nothing in the “Highs” column in their review.

Then why didn't you go to (crazy thought ahead) another dealer?

What kind of Ford dealership has no FiST’s, no FoST’s, no manual Foci, and only one Focus hatch?

You, sir, win.