No, I understand all that. I was referring to the picture I commented on, not all of them.
No, I understand all that. I was referring to the picture I commented on, not all of them.
Where, ever, did anyone mention that it was a “right” to carry a weapon on an airplane?
Except for that, with the exception of a very few articles, Gawker is an overtly liberal organization that constantly bashes gun owners, gun users, and basically anyone that has ever touched a gun. That’s the blogging group. I won’t even go into the commentariat.
I have never flown with any weapons, I was just going by what the NRA posted about TSA rules. From what I’ve read, as long as the primers are protected, and the ammo is packaged in its original packaging or in a ‘secure’ package, to include the magazines (provided they’re securely covered and protecting the brass,…
Do I need to post something with links to all the times that Gawker has posted sensationalist page-click attempts, villainizing scary looking ‘military-style’ weapons?
And these all appear to be. Like I said, I can’t see what the case is. It’s possible that they were removed from their case and placed in whatever plastic bin the TSA had lying around. Also, I noted that they had to be declared.
Probably, but this is likely the TSA (and Gawker) sensationalizing the story. I’m sure they’d both prefer that people not know that it’s legal to travel with guns and ammunition.
The caption specifically said checked luggage, but it wouldn’t be the first time a Gawker blogger got the facts wrong...
For what reason?
I can’t really see what the container is, but I fail to see how this is a problem, other than the ammunition being ‘loose’ and not in secure packaging. Passengers are able to travel with guns, gun parts, and ammunition on airlines, as long as it’s in a hard sided, locked case, and it is declared in checked baggage.
Engineering?
I suppose he could have taken SEPTA. That might actually be the only thing that’s LESS reliable than an Aston Martin, though...
Then, we would eat pizza.
I know that they might, but for now, they haven’t.
No, you don’t. Hangouts has a drop down menu, just to the left of the text input area, that lets you select Hangouts or SMS, and the entire conversation is on seamless thread.
The USN and NATO probably do track all subs that come into their operational areas, but I very much doubt they have an attack sub shadowing and tracking the movements of these boats.
Or, just use Hangouts for both SMS and Hangouts messages.
American crews don’t need to worry themselves too much, Israel is our biggest ally in the region.
Of course all-out nuclear war means that every nation is FUBAR. The amount of radiation released would effectively render the world useless for millions of years.
Incorrect. You need to have at least as many as the other side is willing to hit you with, plus some to ensure a secondary strike. This is the whole purpose of MAD. I won’t go into further detail, but having one weapon just means that your one weapon is a target.