On the ranch? No. In the heart of downtown LA? Very much so. Context does, in fact, matter.

There’s buying a house, which can be done “affordably” (in as much as housing can be affordable), and buying an actual mansion within walking distance of the walk of fame. I can see why even supporters might be mad at that, and the mixed messages it sends.

I’m not saying you might have just dated yourself but you might wanna specify which Matt Dillon.

And it stands a decent chance of being finished before Cyberpunk 2077 is.

It’s not that they’re featuring a woman sniper, it’s that they are doing it while they simultaneously enable and cover up a toxic and harassment filled culture. It’s the inherent hypocrisy of the game. They plan to make millions off the game and yet can’t acknowledge the demands of their employees asking for more…

I misread your comment and apologize.  Same with Overwatch.  That game was 100% sold on it’s inclusive cast which is pretty ironic considering the actions of some of those who made it.  If I’ve said it once... We shouldn’t be relying on capitalism to forward social progress.  They’re only ever in it for the money. …

Next on "fandom is inherently toxic"...

Yeah these comments are horrifying. I prefer the proxy conversations like ‘oh how was this verified’ over these mask-off comments from folks who probably would have set the fire if they had the chance.

Waiting for the moderators to ban and cull the insane sexism in these comments.

More like whats up with creepy fucks who do this sort of behavior and then what is up with these creepy fucks on the internet who try to spin this around on the victim. Get some sun bro.

It’s about ethics in flames journalism.

Honestly, I wouldn’t doubt it winding up being some creepy incel targeting her because she didn’t answer his equally creepy dm’s.

The only thing that needs to be burned down is toxic gamer culture. 

I struggle to even be mad or conjure up hate for this thing. The best I can muster is “meh”.

Because they hurt literally nobody.

Gambling streams = bad because they are exploiting people with gambling addictions and minors

Nope stop the whataboutism right there. This aint about that.

Such a bad take I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt & just assume you dont understand the issue. For one, the gambling sites require a VPN to access from the US, which the streamers do, but using a VPN means they dont have to pay out. The streamers are paid millions to promote essentially a scam in that sense.

Hey, ding dongs. Gambling can be actively harmful to a person. A lady playing a Wii game in a bikini is not. Relax.

Unionization? At an Amazon Company? Man, that’s when Bezos will start sniping people for real if the streamers start networking and coming together.