ivanatinkle1
IvanaTinkle
ivanatinkle1

It most certainly is. This is just PR speak.

'Awesome Touring Sedan'

I never edited my original post. Very convenient to accuse someone of doing that.

The Escalade is better.

Can you read? I never said that the S2000 and 350Z were luxury roadsters (which is why I only mentioned the Boxster, Z4, and SLK, did I not?), nor that a folding metal hardtop makes a luxury roadster (I can't believe you dedicated a paragraph to first misconstrue my statement and then try to argue that I'm wrong.

Yeah, I don't think anyone would want those cars anytime soon or in the future. The Sky, maybe, even then if it were a Solstice Coupe GXP.

You're comparing it to a Boxster, an SLK, and a Z4? Is the Sky a luxury roadster? Does it have a folding metal hardtop?

Righteo. The version of the M159 in the SLS Black Series makes 622 hp. I think I'm going to search the internet for this particular superlative. Still I think it's amazing how Porsche was able to get 608 hp from just 4.6 liters.

Yeah true. The 4Matics put up better numbers than the RWD models. In terms of handling, it's a wash with the Audi RS cars. There are tests in which one or the other is quicker. Audis always win as the better all-around cars, but MBs have started beating them out in terms of steering feel and fun-to-drive-ness.

Yeah, those Euro mags only test the RWD versions of the AMGs. MB never sends any of the 4Matics.

The Audi is turbocharged. AMGFTW specifically said "most powerful NA V8 engine in the world". Now you're just pushing his buttons. :P

Which one in particular?

Even the indication that the new C-Class is up to 200 lbs lighter? Though what trim is remained to be seen.

Weight isn't even out on the C400 yet, so I don't know where you're getting this "200" figure from. Care to share?

Lighter by what? 11 pounds?

Funny. I was wondering just hours ago when they're going to price this thing. I think it's on the more expensive side of things. Though I'd totally have a C400 4Matic over a CLA45 AMG.

Honestly, as a casual Halo fan, I enjoyed Halo 2's campaign the most and I know I'm probably in the teeny tiny minority. Halo 3 and ODST were equal for me. So I'd rank them: 2 > 3 and ODST > 1 > Reach > 4. Halo 4 was the weakest campaign wise by a country mile.

Nothing we haven't seen before. COME ON, mix up the cars a bit: instead of a Diablo SV, how about give us a 6.0 VT? Acura RSX Type-S? How about a Legend Coupe instead? or Accord Euro R? Corsa VXR? When was this car ever relevant? Well, whatever. As long as it makes folks happy.

Who speaks of the Lotus Esprit in a world of 911 Turbos and mid-engined Ferraris? And the Mitsubishi FTO with its teeny tiny V6:

That's a GT car. Not a sports car. Still love it like anything.