I’m not saying it’s more of a rip-off.

*Nintendo makes a thing people only seem to like after it’s gone*

It’s funny because you posted a screen grab of MK vs. DC, easily the worst thing they ever made.

If we’re gonna get technical...

nickel-and-diming features

The sad thing is, we live in a reality where you can’t tell if such criticisms are just being cute and poking fun, or if people really are that unhinged...

I just want real Barret to say this.

Right? I feel like I need a shower too.

That’s cute. You’re cute.

It’s almost like Nintendo saw people would pay $300+ for this, knows that Virtual Console is coming to Switch, and said, “well, why not have them spend the money that way instead?”

“Based on the Switch’s success, we can only assume that Nintendo will soon discontinue it.”

I love how this whole thread is basically 30% posts of a more than a few people saying ‘I work in taxes’ ‘I freelance’ ‘I’m in accounting’ and giving very informed, smart, knowledgeable information...

No, they literally run for a few hours, brand new, right out of the box.

I think they’re both really good, look-wise. They each just have a different tone that informs their aesthetics.

The hero Kotaku needs.

I remember people saying I was crazy for suggesting a self-ascribed ‘balls-to-the-wall, no expense spared, tech-fetishist’s wet dream’ console would be at least $500 at retail.

This is such a blessing!

It kinda bothers me that CN’s main question is ‘how do I get people to try the thing I like/am comfortable with so I can talk about it without feeling judged’ than how to better relate to people different from him.

Because as we all know, a game’s gameplay isn’t feature-complete until eyes look good. It means so much to how you play the actual game!

It’s far more open and involved than ME1, but has the unfortunate circumstance of being in a post-BotW world, where a by-the-numbers open world (which this is) feels strangely barren to me now...