iowafan1
Iowafan1
iowafan1

I think you need to read this article again. Maybe Petsmart will cover some reading comprehension classes?

Ok buddy. Just ignore the fact literally no one else agreed with you and they all agreed with me. But I’m sure you’re the only one who really knows what’s going on in the world

Many. Over 75%. And I get it, they have a narrative to preserve, but it’s ridiculous. They have let up recently now that it’s more widely accepted that she’s worthless but it used to be she was just as infallible as Clinton simply because she supported Clinton

Oh wow you’re such a martyr! Thank you oh thank you!

Ok dad

You realize that does nothing, right faggot? Oh I’m sorry, did I invade your lil safe space?

Ok and? You’re the one who regurgitated all your talking points onto me as we were having a civil discussion about caucus vs. Primaries. Like it literally came out of no where. Your feelings aren’t a substitute for facts, so I’m not too concerned. I’ll be blocking you now nigger

“You, who has proven himself to be a racist, are saying bad things about me”

I don’t use up serious time with serious replies to trolls who have been called out by more people than just me. Fuck off

Well I’m the President of the United States so.

Oh please, spouting off? I’m laughing at your dumb nigger ass right now. That lower circuit judge threw it out on its ass with prejudice meaning it was worthless and anone that would sue a venue for a shooting like this is filing a frivolous case. Judge said so. Unless you know more than the judge? Gawker commenters

Now look: I wouldn’t expect a person incapable of proper grammar to be able to offer an in depth analysis of our legal system. You can barely speak English so I doubt you can understand the law. But if a lawyer gives bad advice just to try to cash in, then he should probably face some responsibility. Do you think the

Then sue the guy that shot them? You’re the moron. What more should the theatre have done? Bullet proof cages for every patron?

A lot of those points I never contested. I agreed with you on a lot. Shows me how desparate you truly are to support her. I won’t be voting for her so I could care less

Fuck off nigger. A caucus is far more democratic and just because people don’t take the time to vote doesn’t mean it’s undemocratic. I get you have a candidate to shill for, but your arguments lack rational and substance. Just because HRC does well with blacks because her name is Clinton doesn’t mean anything

I cringe everytime I see these lawsuits. If I were to die in a mass shooting, I’d hope that my family wouldn’t try to sue just to make a buck. I’m glad they lost, because frivolous lawsuits isn’t how our judicial system should run. Idc about your feelings.

Then maybe they shouldnt have tried to cash in on the deaths of their family members?

*Families seek payout with asinine argument that a fucking movie theatre should be able to protect against an insane guy with an assault rifle

I love how this is the only remotely rational argument HRC fans have. Are they undemocratic? Just the opposite. To be quite honest, having been to both a Republican one and a Democrat one, I’d say the Republican one is more democratic at least in Iowa. You simply listen to candidate surrogates talk, write down your

Good. I really want to know how HRC supporters think it’s truly fair to have her be the party’s chair. I don’t think history at least modern history has ever seen a candidates ‘08 co-chair become party head, and then go out of her way to blatantly speak out against a candidate because he is a) not from the