Yes, absolutely, and without question this is something all online games should adopt. I work at a gym and this is baseline level shit. It’s still crazy to me that people think being online somehow makes this kind of thing acceptable.

It depends on your line of work. If you’re a writer, artist, actor, streamer, spokesperson, lead director, etc, it’s very hard to separate your professional and professional accounts because who you are and your public appearance is a big part of your work. It also depends on how big your team is, how you engage with…

Their take today is basically a short bit of “no Americans are being indited so case closed! Let’s never talk about this again!” before quickly scrambling to more interesting topics like “Strzok is totally biased against Trump (who is innocent)!” and “England is totally biased against Trump (who people are mean to for…

From the sound of things on Twitter, it’s more of a bonus dungeon with lore drops that explain the story a bit more, not a “true ending” scenario for the game.

♥️ star this comment if u think both these women are equally beautiful ♥️

Also can we stop the lie that virtual behavior doesn’t have real-world consequences too? Being a scumbag to other people in a game is still being a scumbag to other people. The game doesn’t take your shitty actions and somehow make them non-shitty. This is especially important with the emergence of social-focused…

“The point is more that non-white people can also use derogatory language when they shouldn’t.”

I mean...

Plus some people see racism/sexism/homophobia as a zero-sum condition; you’re either a total monster or you’re not. It’s a “homophobia is bad, but I’m good, therefore what I said was not homophobic” line of thinking. In reality it’s a process of always failing, accepting when you are wrong, and trying to do/be better.

Jeeze, why do people still use the “well, it’s just a word, and what even are words anyway” defense? Why to straight white folk really wanna use words they shouldn't...

I like this idea. It explains why he can take so many bullets in game but a single pistol shot can seriously wound him in a cutscenes. I just wish maybe it was a bit more obvious in practice. It’s at least cut down on a few "ludonarative dissonance" articles and essays.

I will buy this again and feel no regret.

Blizzard did it. They’re selling literal garbage for $175.

Wrong again. The Good Doctor is a different show.

You forgot the best and most mature part of Octo Expansion: Pearl says “fuck.”

And the whole problem is, it doesn’t do that.

The point is that the article goes on to explain that, yeah, there’s been a possessiveness in the fandom for a long while, but TLJ brought out something worse in people (mostly by way of a very vocal minority that set the tone and rhetoric for why TLJ was an “objectively bad” movie). To say the toxic backlash against…

Glad to hear you read two sentences at least :/

You know, some people also didn’t like The Last Jedi because it’s a structurally questionable movie with some bad writing and underdeveloped (or underused) characters.

Yep, that’s all a part of asymmetric design! You got characters with different strengths and weaknesses and you build levels to play to those strengths and weaknesses. The secret is just not letting a character get too much of an edge over the others. Extra Credits did two episodes specifically about Overwatch’s…