ieatedyourcookie
IEatedYourCookie
ieatedyourcookie

omG! Look at that mom, she is breathing AIR! It is full of POLLUTANTS! Therefore we will stop her from breastfeeding. Quick, somebody lock her into torso body armor — think of the CHILDREN!!

we need to consider that mothers are people, they do things

This is not about the mother’s body. This is about the child, ostensibly.

See, that would be an activity that is filled w risk.

we need to consider that mothers are people, they do things.

Is this for fucking serious? That judge is just allowing that man to control his ex like that? There is no threat of harm to the baby and in fact could suffer harm with forced weaning and being feed a lower quality of food. Seriously, what.the.fuck.

we need to consider that mothers are people, they do things

So, reading “Handmaid’s Tale” this last week was a bad idea for me. I am now blind with rage. I am using a braille typewriter.

First they came for my vagina, and I did not speak out—
Because I took for granted my ability to choose.

And if you end up dead while pregnant, well, we’ll just strap you into an IV and keep your body incubating that fetus.

which they are practically required to do.

women are legit not allowed to do anything w their own bodies except be fucking brood mares.

I’m just glad they didn’t make a $0.77 bill for the woman.

My mom has a theory about cake smashing (you’re really just supposed to be feeding it to each other): that the people who smash it on their spouse’s face show “disrespect” for their partner, so if they do this it means they won't be married for long.

#1: Fundamental lack of adulthood: I GOTTA GET MAH DRINK ONNNNNN FUCKIN’ FECKERS....

#2: cake in the face has always reeked of some serious undercurrents of aggression to me. I’ve no doubt on occasions it’s cute. But more often it feels like some sort of desire to degrade.

Truth. I refused to do that, as well as the cake smashing thing. It’s just tacky.

He’ll be a cake-face-smasher, sure as anything. Ugh. She should be ready for her dress to be ruined and for him to laugh in her face about it.

I work for a nonprofit and my boss spells it like this every single time. I always have to edit the solicitation letters because its so embarrassing and it kills me. I shudder to think how many times he misspelled it before I started working here.

It's not the same because men are the dominant and privileged group. It doesn't threaten men's lives to take care while rejecting them in case a hard "no" will cause them to turn verbally abusive or physically violent. There's a difference between a marginalized class protecting themselves against violence from a

Did I suggest that all men need to be treated as murderers?