I don't know how you keep a straight face with some of these commenters.

At the very least, he's controlling the situation and making it about your looks. He's thinking, she looks beautiful right now and I'm going to talk to her about her looks. And then he does. Even if you go that far, he has 1) Judged you first and foremost on your looks 2) Decided how he felt about those looks, as he…

That's after he's in court and public opinion has turned. These are photos right after the fact, when he's still a suspect. And before they know the feel of the public's reaction (know the safe bet)—he's an honor student.

Eventually, but I think the point stands. Why are these titles even running. He was brilliant vs. he deserved it?

Welp, thanks for making me google that crackpot...

Love your name. Probably would post 'love the suit' gif from Hannibal here. Not in a creepy way though.

HAHAHAHA "One Huge Bitch™ "…stealing THAT...

At first I get annoyed by the trolls, and then I realize they have spent ALLLLLLL DDDAAAYYY replying, in multi-para text, to all their respondents. And that's just sad for them (and whatever job they're supposed to be doing).

No, he wanted space, he broke up with her, she got all dressed up and went out on the town with her friends, he got jealous, then Carole whisked her away on vacation/retreat somewhere, which is when he started calling and some long phone calls later they're back together—two months tops.

Because the counter to Kate in the U.S. is Kardashian. We're relieved to see someone with something that matches, is tailored, looks presentable—and it's not possible to waste time scrutinizing her weight gain/loss, because she never does. She's the perfect antidote for the U.S. tabloids—the only trouble she can…

Why would they adore Harry? He makes fewer public appearances than they do, had generally the same job as Will, and doesn't do much else (activism) that I can tell. Meaning, I don't see that he has more impact than them. Just because he's the youngest?

Not only are there people to do it, there are at least three. Only one of them went on the Australia down under tour, but think of that—-11 people in the entourage. One slot of out the 11 was for a professional hairdresser.

Eh, I don't believe any of that. Political maneuvering? Please—he took his sweet time proposing (8 years?) and he was the one to break up with her. The Middletons were hardly the ones in charge. Plus, I don't think it's so hard to believe the marriage, if you ever look at them together—empirically, they are…

I know! Inexpensive? Pretty sure at $600+ they're in the realm of Manolos. What is an 'expensive' shoe—$800?

Mulling over the fact that my job here in the U.S. required the same thing…virginity clause was not mentioned, but women had to submit a PAP smear to be considered for employment. Your choice of doctor. Plausible reason being—screen for the slowest-growing of cancers?

Don't feed the troll, he's not even good at it.

'When something can be read with very little effort, much effort has gone into the writing of it.' Good writers can write long and well, and short and well—-but this was long and awful.

I can't even pretend to read this. Are there no editors anymore, or have we outsourced them to another time zone? This needed an abstract and a TL;DR.

I don't know where I stand on this. By definition the analogy compares like things, so the victim blaming conversation as it started compared values of robbery and rape. Which we're now debating. However, I can't say I'd want a gag-order on comparing often-used-examples of victim-blaming to explain other instances of…

Scrolling, scrolling….haven't seen it yet.