Wow! That is WAY more thorough than a dang Jalopnik post has any right to be!

I’m admittedly no expert in this kind of science, so forgive me if this is idiotic, but I genuinely want to understand this better than I currently do. I’m looking at this sort of like the case of that guy over in Europe who collected a wagon full of smartphones, put them in “driving GPS mode” and just walked around…

Can you look yourself in the mirror and say that we’ll be better off without the DOE? Or that what’s about to happen to it is going to make it anything but worse?

About teaching people to drive effectively... I have good news and bad news about the future of the Department of Education.

You don’t. I rented a 27-footer in grad school a few times. You can just hop right in and drive off. It’s utterly terrifying.

I note, with some dismay, that the tip of the nose cone is slightly south of the bullseye. I know there’s a target for it just below the crosshairs, and it’s definitely hitting the target where it’s supposed to, and missing the target by a few inches absolutely wouldn’t matter given the forces and masses involved...

Gonna raise your blood pressure right quick!

Spoken like a true disruptor!

A vehicle that drives itself, with no ability to be overridden by the occupant, kind of needs to be hack-proof.

Declaring something “hack-proof” is just daring people to work out how to do it.

Cars have been used as Taxi Cabs since 1897. Why complicate things?

Seriously. I’m a wealthy, straight, white, cis-dude with a PhD in immunology. I will be fine, and if I’m not, I can afford to bail to the UK. But a lot of people can’t, and they’re the ones I’m concerned for. And the kids who are getting this forced on them.

Genuinely surprised this turned out as well as it did.

Sir, this is a car website. Interpreting everything said here as ironclad, unshakeable, direct, fully-fleshed out statements of God’s own truth, or even one’s full opinion on a subject is... a bit silly.

Methinks you don’t read so good. Garland has proven to be a thoughtful individual, one capable of impartiality, objectivity, and open-mindedness.

Meanwhile, his brother is the kid who has to tell his parents that he’s actually pooping, *right now.*

Oh, big same. But let’s be honest with ourselves. The fight went the distance, despite an age gap that is approximately *two full boxing careers* long. Successful careers, mind you.

But for real, they’re both probably north of six feet tall, and both pretty brawny. Those things they’re sitting on are just WAY too small. His knees are well above his beltline, which is itself level with the truck’s beltline.

This has got to be the largest delta between “How cool I think I look” versus “How stupid I actually look” I’ve seen in a very long time. He clearly wanted to project rugged bravado, braggadocio, and badassery, riding above it all in a rad truck from back when his opponent was relevant. But he looks like he got a…

No, someone who is willfully ignorant is an idiot. Someone who believes demonstrably false claims is an idiot.