Well Cecilia...

Darn, I was hoping for an infographic to show what different symbols meant

Here in the ex-Gawker network, there’s NEVER a wrong time to shoehorn in tired leftist politics into any article. The Mexican corporate overlords over at Univision that bought this network are very pleased: they don’t really care about making profits, they just like reaching the target demographic with left wing…

“The amendment would allow insurers to sell policies that don’t include maternity care, newborn care, ...”

I’m sorry, but how does this article fit into Lifehacker? I don’t remember Gina Trapani going on about LGBTQ issues. All this Politico-type stuff is getting irritating.

Average time spent reading “Gawker” media articles: 12 seconds.

Here’s what you do, you buy Ninja 250 for $3K, try it out. If you want to move up or don’t like it. Sell it for $2500.

Yeah, I got destroyed in another comment section on here with that same mentality. If you think men (or anybody) is just inherently subconsciously sexist, how do you expect to have a productive conversation? Especially when they openly admit their ignorance and are looking for answers? Lose-lose.

I didn’t make that argument.

A lot of men report that their orgasms are much less satisfying when they don’t ejaculate at all. Some people think this is a petty concern, but it kind of defeats the point of birth control if it significantly reduces satisfaction. You can argue that condoms have a similar limitation, but condoms are not a drug and…

I guess? Maybe I’m just old, but I’d rather just jump into the shower for even two minutes (soap, rinse, dry), than have to fool with two kinds of wet wipes, dry shampoo, a frozen bottle, and assorted toiletries. It seems as though it just creates extra landfill, bother and expense. To each his or her own, perhaps? 😊

Unless it’s rape, a woman doesn’t have to have sex with a man without using condoms.

Not liking something doesn’t make it less safe, affordable and effective.

This is an adorable fantasy. This implies that men have some type of critical scientific knowledge that we’re conspiring to keep from the world. I guess if men got pregnant, there’d never be the Apollo Moonlanding Hoax and we’d have proof that 9/11 was an inside job.

And abortions would be available at CVS.

There is - condoms and diaphragms - but people don’t like using them.

Bonus: that means you can’t transmit any STDs, either

The only one that really seems feasible and convenient is the last option - The ‘Clean Sheets’ pill. I think there could be a concern, though, because muscles are susceptible to conditioning. You’d probably want to make sure you also have orgasms allowing everything to do it’s job as intended to keep them in working…

What is it? Vasalgel is a gel that can be injected (through the scrotum, it only hurts for a second, don’t be a baby)

I’ve read a few times of women bosses being sexist towards women. Is it just that people are sexists towards women? I hate asking questions like this, because I did in another reply and apparently it made me blame women/victims instead of the perpetrator. So i’ll leave my question there and take the heat.