hominahomonym2
HominaHomonym2
hominahomonym2

“While you can use this tool to imagine, say, a French bomb taking out downtown Cleveland...”

And apparently they already caved (Democrats).

TS: DR

TL:DR

TL:DR

TL:DR

TL:DR

So if I take my phone just to read on my Kindle because for the few minutes I need to use the crapper at work and it helps me relax (in more ways than one), am I totally defeating the point here? Reading a good story is for me about as meditative as just letting my mind wander without a direct stimulus pinging upon

TL:DR

TL:DR

TL:DR

Actually it was a seriously intended question to try and have a valid discussion about better nuances in handling a criminal case versus a civil one especially where there can be a new technological difficulty in determining actual culpability. But hey, if nobody wants to read or actually engage in civil or

Your body has evolved the ability to eject foreign matter or clear its passages by means of a 100-plus mph burst of reflex-driven air...other than the social stigma of sneezing accidentally on a person or making a big sloppy mess if you don’t have a chance (or proper upbringing) to deal with it as it comes

And I raise the same point: what about the risk of this being a false accusation? Unlike rape where there can be a lot of corroboration aside from rape kits or direct witnesses, the forensic trails for tracking down someone posting an image are a little trickier and muddier since events like “the fappening” took place

So you didn’t bother to read what I wrote, even though I took the time and consideration to try and give better clarification to what I’m asking as a matter of discussion.

And it seems clear that even asking a point of consideration in this, when criminality is a serious thing (and one that can be easily botched by our

So you didn’t bother to read what I wrote, even though I took the time and consideration to try and give better clarification to what I’m asking as a matter of discussion. Yet you’re going to reply, even though by default your reply won’t actually be an informed one since you’re willfully ignorant of what I’ve put out

You’re giving circular reasoning. You’re stating that I’m a ‘criminal,’ but only because of it’s declaration as a criminal act in ‘37 states and counting.’ That’s not what I’m asking about or trying to civilly discuss.

What I’m asking is: why is it a criminal act? Bear in mind: I am absolutely not defending voyeurism,

So even this creator thinks it sucks...but obviously not suck enough to not release it online in the first place. Just dump your crap on the massive alleyway that is the world wide web and let everybody else deal with it even if you immediately claim to disown (while anonymously sitting back to see if it gets viral or

Man...that kid from “Last Action Hero” has NOT aged well...

“Revenge porn” is still a weirdly dicey area to me. Mainly because if we’re talking about anything that was even remotely non-consensual when it was generated or entrusted to someone, then it’s just basically bad decision making only realized after the fact (aka “a mistake”). If you and I are in a relationship and we