Sure, you are absolutely correct. But the same goes for her. No where is there an indication that she has initiated sex with her husband.

I disagreed with the poster above with the "work for the relationship" phrase, but I do think that everyone needs to work to maintain a relationship. She absolutely needs to work on carving out time for intimacy with her husband. Turn the TV off. Take a shower after the gym. Or discuss the root of what's going on here…

Sure... and when did she ever initiate sex or suggest a more convenient time for her? (Or take a shower at night, for goodness sake, if that's the only thing holding her back sometimes.)

Exactly! Some of my favorite sex are those raw, passionate, time-constrained engagements. Although, I'm a guy who has sex with other guys. YMMV. I don't have to worry about that elusive female orgasm.

But there is no indication that she is initiating sex at any other time. Sure some of his attempts may be lazy or bad timing some times, but she could easily fix that by initiating sex at a better time for her. I'm sure he'd be agreeable with sex another time.

Actually, it IS work to connect with your partner and improve intimacy. This goes further than just sex, as you indicate, and she should take the time to work on her relationship - all aspects of it.

But there is no indications that she has EVER initiated sex. Instead, she has rejected him 27 times. How is that ok to you?

OK, but there is nothing indicating that she initiated sex... ever.

You essentially told your wife - to her face - that you're bored with her? So, um, have your balls descended again after being kicked back up into your guts?

Nut who am I going to get stoned with on Saturday nights now?

Ha - My Mom would likely say the same thing.

Kim was doing Claire a favor. Claire is a fat girl's name.

And by "childhood years" I mean last Christmas and we're both in our 30's...

So all those childhood years of sitting on my brother's head and farting were actually preventative care?

I don't think someone willing to live in a missile silo would see being remote as a drawback. Well, I certainly wouldn't.

Must have a bacon!

By now, of course, the virus has mutated enough that the zombie apocalypse we've all been promised is fast approaching.

To be fair, the country has been evolving ever since the Constitution was ratified and bears little resemblance to what the framers actually created. The Treaty of Paris, on the other hand, formally and diplomatically recognizes the United States of America as a distinct and independent sovereign state (well,…

I like your logic, but celebrating as our birthday the signing of the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783 does have some logic too.

Maybe if it recharged itself with daily, long jerking motions up and down.