helgaperez
helgaperez
helgaperez

“Fixing or modifying the Democratic Party is fine. But you have to beat the Republicans first.”

I feel the ‘safe, legal, and rare’ is a good argument,”

go into the Democrat’s tent and toss out all the wannabe Republicans

If he can convince them it’s really the fault of immigrants, Muslims, and trans people, they’ll still be fired up.

In your original statement, you said it might be for the best if Trump won against Biden and, as a result of that loss, the Democratic Party’s “big tent” collapsed. That sounded very like a preference to me. However, I am glad to hear I misunderstood your original statement. 

The Democratic Party also wants control of the Presidency, Congress, and to put some more justices on the Supreme Court, but they are not willing to go as far as Republicans to accomplish that. Democrats are the ones fighting against voter suppression and fighting for ranked choice voting. I am voting for anyone who

The comment I was responding to said “That might be for the best,” and that is the part I disagree with. I do not think ANY Democratic presidential candidate losing to Trump would be “for the best”. We cannot afford another 4 years of Trump, regardless of how a Trump win might wake up the centrists - which I don’t

Because even though they say that abortion is murder, a lot of them don’t truly believe that. They may believe a fetus is a valuable life, but not as valuable a life as a 12-year-old who was raped. More valuable than the life of a someone whose birth control failed, though. For many people who want to ban abortion

No. Even a Biden presidency is better than another 4 years of Trump. Another 4 years of Trump further erodes the possibility of Democrats, progressives, and liberals having any foothold in government at all. Trump wants to be a dictator. The GOP wants one-party rule, and will do anything to achieve that. Another four

I am with Warren, too, but I will also be happy if I am wrong about Fox viewers and somehow Buttigieg or Sanders winds up in the White House.

It makes exceptions for the life of the mother, and for birth defects incompatible with living outside the womb. So, not total, but very close to total.

If they could afford it. We need a system where people can afford to go to a primary care physician or urgent care and don't have the ER as their only healthcare choice. 

I think you answered your own question: “Doctor’s visit in USA: if insurance covers it, will cost between $10-$25 co-pay. If no insurance, hundreds of dollars for the same care.

It’s very common for ERs to take forever, but it’s not like that everywhere. I went to one ER recently where I was seen within minutes. Why were they so quick? This ER is surrounded by residential neighborhoods full of people who can afford insurance. They can afford to take time off work and go see their primary care

I would also be happy with Warren/Castro.

If non-natives had never come here, the natural wealth of this continent would belong to the indigenous people and they would not be living on tiny patches of land, so I strongly believe they would be better off if Europeans had never set foot in the Americas.

I want a Warren/Harris administration, followed by a Harris presidency.

She was born with health problems, so perhaps her family had some idea that she would not live as long as most housecats. That doesn't make the loss any easier, though. 

Seven is not very old for a cat. Indoor cats generally live about 12 to 18 years, and it’s not that unusual for them to reach 20 or beyond. Grumpy Cat was born with health problems, so it isn’t that surprising she passed away at an early age, but it's still very sad. I am sure she had a pampered, happy life while she

I thought his point was that the defining characteristic of the people who write and pass this legislation is that they are white, and that claiming it is just rich Christian men who are doing this is wrong, since support for these laws crosses gender and economic lines, and black people overwhelmingly do not support