I just replayed this game on Cemu last month. Cemu allows you to toggle between the two screens (remember, the Wii-U had a separate gamepad), or even to keep both open in whatever arrangement you prefer, and while it’s possible to go through most of the game without making use of the second screen, I’d say it’s pretty…

I hated, and literally laughed at, this game when I first played it. I thought it was just a mess. I was playing it fully two-player at the time.

“Spider-Man characters were all over the recent multi-platform Lego Marvel games, too.” 

You literally said it’s more about management and busywork than story. Now you’re agreeing that it’s more about story.

“more about stats management and grinding busy-work than it is about narrative.”

That’s . . . not refuting what I said. Of course one agenda can take a long time to be ironed out. My point was that they’re not stuck on just that one agenda the entire time.

Yes, the growing number of progressives in government are slowly destroying the centrist monopoly.

My problem with your premise is that Trump supporters/conservatives/Republicans have never allowed themselves to be tied down by positions or principles. Hypocrisy certainly hasn’t stopped them yet. Look at Mitch McConnell and the Supreme Court, or on any position, really. In four years, they’ll have a new ghoul and…

Wait . . . you think if Centrists started their own party and joined with the never-Trump Republicans, everyone would move left? I don’t see how that happens if the hard-right and center-right form a coalition.

The Dem running in my NY district is the same guy who ran and lost two years ago, and if he wins (which he probably won’t), he will be exactly the type you describe in your first sentence.

You know Congress votes on different things each day, right? It’s not like one agenda ties up an entire month of deliberations.

Holy strawman, Batman! (Or, holy strawman, Strawman?)

^points to above article.

“The centrists are destroying the progressive movement.”

Nobody likes Revelations. Also, it’s funny you told me not to @ you, and then you replied anyway when I did.

By your own logic, you can’t tell one person to get off their high horse unless you criticize everyone who’s on a high horse.

This is whataboutism. One need not criticize every example of corruption and human rights abuses in order to criticize one. The news is about this cancelled deal. That’s what we’re discussing.

This is whataboutism. Someone doesn’t need to address all human rights abuses in order to criticize one example of human rights abuse.

What?

I understand your sentiment, but things are more complicated than that.